The Congress party has demanded an apology from Prime Minister Narendra Modi for defending Union Home Minister Amit Shah's controversial remarks about Dr. Baba Saheb Ambedkar. Party leaders Gaurav Gogoi and Pramod Tiwari accused the BJP of behaving in a fascist manner and expressed disappointment that no FIR has been filed in their complaint about the incident involving BJP and Congress MPs. Tiwari also highlighted the disrespectful and insulting tone of Amit Shah's speech, and Gogoi revealed that Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge has requested an inquiry into the incident where he fell due to the actions of BJP MPs.
Ambedkar Controversy: Congress Demands Apology for Amit Shah's Remarks
Background:
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, known as Babasaheb Ambedkar, was a prominent Indian jurist, reformer, and the chief architect of the Indian Constitution. His contributions to the Dalit (formerly known as Untouchables) community, the abolition of caste discrimination, and the drafting of the Indian Constitution have earned him widespread reverence.
Current Controversy:
On December 6, 2022, Union Home Minister Amit Shah made controversial remarks about Dr. Ambedkar during a speech in Gujarat. Shah claimed that Ambedkar was opposed to the reservation system for the backward classes, which has long been a pillar of Indian society.
These remarks sparked a fierce backlash from the Congress party, which accused Shah of distorting history and disrespecting the legacy of Dr. Ambedkar. Congress leaders demanded an apology from Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who defended Shah's comments.
Congress's Response:
Congress leaders Gaurav Gogoi and Pramod Tiwari condemned Shah's remarks as "fascist" and expressed disappointment that no FIR had been filed in response to their complaint about the incident involving BJP and Congress MPs.
Tiwari highlighted the disrespectful and insulting tone of Shah's speech, while Gogoi revealed that Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge had requested an inquiry into the incident where he fell due to the actions of BJP MPs.
BJP's Defense:
Prime Minister Modi defended Shah's remarks, stating that Ambedkar had indeed expressed reservations about the reservation system. However, Modi emphasized that Ambedkar's views had evolved over time, and that he ultimately supported the system as a temporary measure to uplift marginalized communities.
Top 5 FAQs:
1. What were Amit Shah's controversial remarks about Ambedkar?
Shah claimed that Ambedkar was opposed to the reservation system for backward classes, which has long been a pillar of Indian society.
2. Why did the Congress party demand an apology?
The Congress accused Shah of distorting history and disrespecting the legacy of Dr. Ambedkar.
3. What was the BJP's response to the controversy?
Prime Minister Modi defended Shah's remarks, stating that Ambedkar had indeed expressed reservations about the reservation system.
4. What is the significance of the reservation system in India?
The reservation system, also known as affirmative action, is a government policy that sets aside a certain percentage of positions in education and government jobs for members of historically disadvantaged communities, such as the Dalits.
5. What is the relationship between Dr. Ambedkar and the reservation system?
Dr. Ambedkar was instrumental in drafting the Indian Constitution, which includes provisions for the reservation system. However, his views on the system evolved over time, and he ultimately supported it as a temporary measure to uplift marginalized communities.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently sparked controversy by claiming that the Congress party, under the leadership of Jawahar Lal Nehru, conspired to defeat Dalit icon BR Ambedkar in the 1951-52 Lok Sabha elections. This accusation was made in defense of his political confidante, Home Minister Amit Shah, who had stated that the constant mention of Ambedkar's name has become a "fashion" in Indian politics. However, historical records show that Ambedkar lost the elections to the Congress candidate not once, but twice. How did Ambedkar's relationship with Nehru affect his political career, and was his defeat really a result of Nehru's actions?
Former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel has called for the release of CCTV footage showing the alleged physical altercation between Congress leader Rahul Gandhi and a BJP MP in the Parliament complex. Baghel also criticised Union Home Minister Amit Shah for his 'inflammatory' comments regarding Dalit icon B.R. Ambedkar. Rahul Gandhi and the Congress have refuted the accusations and retaliated with their own complaint. Baghel also expressed concerns over the law and order situation in Chhattisgarh under the BJP government.
The Assembly constituency of Ambedkar Nagar, located near Saket in South Delhi, is home to a majority of lower-middle-class and middle-class families. Residents express their disappointment and frustration towards the recent political bickering in the Parliament over B R Ambedkar's legacy and instead look to the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) for tangible solutions to their everyday issues. While the Congress and BJP continue to compete for the support of voters, the AAP has already gained the trust of many residents through their policies and actions. However, some residents remain skeptical and call out the timing of the AAP's recent efforts in the area.
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath highlights the destruction of Hindu temples in various parts of the country and reiterates the need for protecting Sanatan Dharma for world peace. He speaks out against the atrocities faced by Hindus in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan and vows to destroy the lineage of those who desecrated Hindu places of worship. Adityanath's remarks come a day after RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat spoke about inclusivity and building a model of harmony in the country that can be adopted by the world.
The Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Jagan's controversial decision to boycott assembly sessions unless accorded the status of opposition leader is causing tension within his own party. People are questioning his motives and demanding answers as to why he and his 10 party MLAs should be allowed to stay away from the assembly without facing consequences. The situation is only escalating as Jagan continues to make impossible demands, leading to concerns about the party's political future.
Opposition leaders have welcomed RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat's statement condemning certain Hindu leaders for spreading hate and enmity. However, they have expressed skepticism about the actions of the Sangh Parivar and its affiliates. While lauding Bhagwat's remarks, they have urged him to take a stronger stand against divisive forces within the RSS and clarify their stance on Hindutva. They also criticized the RSS for promoting harmful ideologies that foster division in society.
In a significant development, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has acknowledged direct communication with Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the Syrian rebel group that led the overthrow of President Bashar al-Assad. Despite HTS's pledge to protect minority and women's rights, U.S. officials remain cautious and are closely monitoring the group's governance approaches. The fall of Assad has raised both hopes and concerns, and the international community is closely watching HTS's actions as it assumes a leadership role.
RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat emphasized the need for a balanced approach to development and education, stating that by combining sacred traditions with modern innovations, India can achieve true progress. He called for an education system that is supportive and community-oriented, and praised the National Education Policy for its multidisciplinary approach. Other speakers at the event also emphasized the importance of preserving India's cultural roots while embracing modernity, and expressed concerns about the influence of Western culture on value-based education and family systems.
The Bombay High Court dismissed a petition challenging the Maharashtra government's decision on the Dharavi slum redevelopment project in Mumbai. The court upheld the tender awarded to Adani Properties Private Limited, stating that the grounds raised in the petition lacked force. The Adani Group emerged as the highest bidder for the project in the 2022 tender process, after the previous tender in 2018 was cancelled.