In a hearing regarding the constitutional validity of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna stated that the Supreme Court has recorded the Centre's assurance that no appointments will be made to Waqf Boards and Councils under the Act until the next hearing. The Court has directed that a nodal counsel be appointed to coordinate amongst all parties involved and that no Waqf property, including those declared by notification, will be altered by the Collector. The Centre has been ordered to provide a response within seven days and the petitioners have been given five days to respond.
In a recent hearing, the Supreme Court has ordered protection of registered Waqf and announced that the Centre will have to respond within seven days to the petitions challenging the Waqf (Amendment) Act. This comes as the court continues to hear the petitions challenging the act, ensuring that Waqf, already registered or declared, will not be denotified or changed by the Collector until the next hearing. This decision has been met with both scrutiny and support from various political entities.
The Waqf Amendment Bill, which was earlier passed by the Lok Sabha, sparked a heated debate in the Rajya Sabha today. While BJP MP JP Nadda defended PM Modi's welfare for all principle, Shiv Sena MP Sanjay attacked the BJP for ignoring the interests of Muslims. Union Minister Giriraj Singh also joined in, accusing the Congress of crossing the limits of appeasement by giving away 123 properties to Waqf in Lutyens' Delhi overnight in 2013. The debate highlights the deep division and polarizing views over the proposed amendments to the Waqf Act in Uttar Pradesh, the state with the highest number of Waqf properties in the country.
The Lok Sabha braces itself for a heated session as the Centre brings back the divisive Waqf (Amendment) Bill for consideration and passage. The eight-hour debate, agreed upon by leaders from all major parties, could be extended after taking the sense of the House. The previously introduced bill had faced backlash from the Opposition and was sent to a Joint Committee for further scrutiny, leading to clashes over proposed amendments and dissent notes being allegedly redacted. Some of the biggest points of contention include allowing non-Muslims to hold key positions in the Waqf board, giving power to the District Collector to determine ownership of disputed property, and removing the tribunal's final decision clause.
In a strong opposition to the proposed Waqf bill, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board has urged all Muslims in the country to wear black armbands during Friday prayers as a sign of peaceful protest. This appeal comes ahead of the highly anticipated 2025 Delhi Assembly Elections and the Union Budget announcement, showing the board's determination to make their voices heard. With this move, the community hopes to bring attention to their concerns and urge the government to reconsider their decision.
RJD leaders Lalu Prasad Yadav and Tejashwi Yadav joined the All India Muslim Personal Law Board's protest against the Waqf (Amendment) Bill. Tejashwi Yadav assured the protesters that his party and its leader stand firmly with them in their fight against the bill. The AIMPLB has launched a nationwide agitation, while BJP MP Jagdambika Pal accused the board of politicising the issue and misleading minorities for political gain.
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has kickstarted a nationwide agitation against the Waqf Amendment Bill, with the first protest held in Patna. Muslim organizations from across the country are gathering in Gardanibagh, urging the government to reconsider the proposed changes in Waqf property regulations. Amid mounting opposition, the Central Government has called for a meeting with all Members of Parliament to discuss the Bill's provisions. The AIMPLB has also invited Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar to join the protest in an effort to gain momentum and raise awareness about the potential consequences of the Bill on the Muslim community.
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has taken to the streets to protest against the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, which seeks to amend existing laws governing properties donated for religious or charitable purposes. While the BJP insists that the Bill is necessary to safeguard national interests, opposition parties like AIMIM and Samajwadi Party have called it a "black Bill" and criticised the lack of democratic process in its formulation. As the political and social divide on the matter widens, uncertainty prevails over the future of the Bill.
All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) has taken to the streets of Delhi, demanding the withdrawal of the Waqf Amendment Bill introduced by the government. Joining their protest is AIMIM Chief and MP, Asaduddin Owaisi, who strongly believes that the bill will not only fail to protect Waqf properties but also strip Muslims of their graveyards, Khanqahs, and Dargahs. The bill, which has gained opposition from leaders like Owaisi, Chandrababu Naidu, and Nitish Kumar, was referred to a joint committee of Parliament last year and has now been submitted with changes suggested by members of the ruling BJP.
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) stages a demonstration at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi against the Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024 during the ongoing Budget Session of Parliament. The bill, which seeks over 40 changes to the current Waqf Act, has been met with opposition from various Muslim organizations, who believe it could undermine constitutional principles and violate minority rights. However, Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi of the All India Muslim Jamaat dismisses these concerns and criticizes the timing of the protest during the sacred month of Ramzan.