A widow expresses her anger and sorrow as she confronts a medical professor at an inquest over her husband's death due to a misdiagnosed cancer. John Leach, a former NHS worker who was exposed to asbestos, passed away earlier this year after being denied a scan by the hospital. The professor defended his decision, explaining that scans are not routinely done for coughs.
Tragic Misdiagnosis: Widow Confronts Professor Over Husband's Death
A grieving widow has expressed her anger and sorrow at an inquest into her husband's death, which she believes was caused by a medical misdiagnosis.
Background
John Leach, a former NHS worker who was exposed to asbestos, passed away earlier this year. His widow, Cheryl, alleges that he was denied a scan by the hospital despite presenting symptoms of cancer. As a result, the cancer was not diagnosed until it was too late.
Inquest Proceedings
At an inquest into John's death, Cheryl confronted the medical professor who made the decision not to order a scan. The professor defended his decision, explaining that scans are not routinely done for coughs.
This explanation has angered Cheryl, who believes that her husband's death could have been prevented if he had been given a scan. She has accused the professor of negligence and incompetence.
Top 5 FAQs
The state government of Punjab has issued a show cause notice to the Lovely Professional University (LPU) for violating government orders to shut down due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The notice, issued on Thursday, asks LPU to explain within seven days why their no objection certificate should not be revoked for endangering the lives of 3,200 people. Despite orders from the higher education minister to suspend teaching activities, LPU continued to function, ignoring social distancing norms and keeping the district administration in the dark.
After the Mahayuti alliance's landslide victory in Maharashtra Assembly elections, current Chief Minister Eknath Shinde has submitted his resignation to the Governor. As the term of the current government ends today, Shinde will serve as caretaker CM until a new leader is sworn in. All eyes are on who will secure the CM post, with BJP MLAs supporting Fadnavis. Meanwhile, rituals and pujas are being conducted in over 100 temples for Shinde's continuation as CM in the Mahayuti 2.0 government yet to be formed.
Following the landslide victory of the Mahayuti coalition in Maharashtra, Eknath Shinde has resigned as Chief Minister and been appointed as caretaker by the Governor. However, the suspense over who will be the next chief minister continues as the Aghadi alliance's dream to wrest power has been shattered. Despite their thumping victory, the Mahayuti coalition has been delayed in forming the government due to the Shiv Sena's insistence on Shinde continuing as chief minister.
Six people, including security personnel, have been killed and over 100 injured as protests turned violent in Islamabad. The government has deployed the army and ordered them to shoot on sight. The protests, demanding the release of ex-PM Imran Khan, come amidst political tension in the country. Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi also invoked the Constitution in a recent speech, suggesting that the issue may play a role in the 2024 elections.
The Supreme Court of India has rejected three petitions requesting the removal of the words 'secular' and 'socialist' from the Indian Constitution's Preamble. The Bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna, stated that the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution extends to the Preamble as well. The court also clarified that the terms 'secular' and 'socialist' are integral to the Constitution and do not restrict the government's economic policies or private initiatives.
As India celebrates the 75th anniversary of its Constitution, the political scene is abuzz with discussions on its teachings and values. The Congress has requested two days in Parliament to discuss the document, while President Droupadi Murmu stressed its significance in a joint sitting. The Supreme Court also upheld the validity of ‘secular’ and ‘socialist’ in the Preamble, with Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar emphasizing the need for constructive dialogue to uphold the sanctity of our democratic institutions and promote informed citizenship.
In a special event held at the Rashtrapati Bhavan, President Droupadi Murmu paid tribute and recognized the crucial contributions of 15 women members of the Indian Constituent Assembly in shaping the country's constitutional framework. During her address, President Murmu highlighted the significant impact of these women in ensuring gender equality and representation in the democratic process, and their tireless efforts in making the Constitution inclusive and progressive. This event serves as a powerful reminder of the remarkable women who have played a pivotal role in shaping the destiny of India.
After the term of the Maharashtra state assembly came to an end, Chief Minister Eknath Shinde stepped down from his post. However, he will continue serving as the caretaker CM until the Mahayuti alliance decides on new leadership. The political decision has sparked discussions and speculations about who will take over as the new CM.
Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna spoke at a Constitution Day event, highlighting the transformative journey of India since independence and the role of the Constitution in shaping the country. He emphasized that the Constitution is a way of life that must be upheld by both judges and members of the bar. The annual observance of Constitution Day was officially declared in 2015 to honor the values enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
The Supreme Court has dismissed a set of petitions demanding the elimination of "secular", "socialist" and "integrity" from the Preamble of the Indian Constitution. The court stated that after 44 years of their introduction in 1976 by the Indira Gandhi government, there is no genuine reason for challenging the Constitutional amendment. The petitioners, including Subramanian Swamy, argued that these words violate the basic structure of the Constitution, but the apex court disagreed and emphasized that parliament holds the power to amend it. The court also pointed out the delay in filing the petition and clarified that parliament's power to amend the Constitution is not constrained by the date of its adoption.