A couple in New Jersey sued Uber after being severely injured in a crash caused by an Uber driver, but their case was dismissed due to a previous agreement they had made with the company. The agreement, which the couple's daughter approved while ordering food, included a clause stating that any incidents or accidents would be settled through arbitration rather than in a court of law. This ruling highlights the use of arbitration clauses by companies to protect themselves from legal action and raises questions about consumer rights and the impact of such clauses on individuals seeking compensation for injuries.
Arbitration Clauses: Uber Passengers Left Injured and Without Recourse
Background:
In a recent case, a couple in New Jersey suffered severe injuries in an Uber crash. However, their lawsuit against Uber was dismissed due to an arbitration clause they had unknowingly agreed to. This ruling sheds light on the growing prevalence of arbitration clauses in consumer contracts and the potential consequences for individuals seeking compensation for injuries.
Arbitration clauses require disputes to be resolved through an arbitration process rather than in a court of law. Companies often include such clauses in their contracts to save time and money on legal proceedings. However, arbitration can limit the rights of consumers, as they may not have the same protections or access to damages as they would in court.
The Uber Case:
The New Jersey couple filed a lawsuit against Uber, claiming negligence and demanding compensation for their medical expenses and lost wages. However, Uber argued that the lawsuit should be dismissed due to an arbitration clause in the ride-sharing app's terms of service.
The couple claimed that they had not knowingly agreed to the arbitration clause. However, the court ruled that their daughter had approved the terms and conditions while ordering food through the Uber Eats app. This approval, the court held, bound the couple to the arbitration clause, even though it was not directly related to the ride-sharing service.
Implications:
The dismissal of the couple's lawsuit highlights the potential risks of arbitration clauses for consumers. These clauses can prevent individuals from pursuing legal action and obtaining fair compensation for injuries. Furthermore, they can be hidden in lengthy and complex contracts, making it difficult for consumers to fully understand their rights.
Top 5 FAQs:
An arbitration clause is a provision in a contract that requires disputes to be resolved through arbitration rather than in court.
Companies use arbitration clauses to save time and money on legal proceedings and to avoid the risk of large jury awards.
Arbitration clauses are generally considered binding if they are clear and unambiguous. However, they may be invalidated if they are deemed to be unconscionable or if there is evidence of fraud or coercion.
In some cases, consumers may have the option to opt out of an arbitration clause within a certain time period. However, this is not always possible, and consumers should carefully review contracts before signing them.
Arbitration proceedings are typically closed to the public and can be subject to different rules and procedures than court proceedings. This can limit the rights of consumers, who may not have the same access to discovery, evidence, and legal remedies as they would in court.
Nithin Kamath, the co-founder and CEO of Zerodha, commends India's market watchdog SEBI for taking decisive action against US-based trading major Jane Street for manipulating the Bank Nifty index. Kamath praises SEBI for maintaining a strong and transparent regulatory environment, while cautioning about potential implications on the market due to a significant presence of proprietary trading firms like Jane Street. The firm has been accused of making extraordinary profits through complex strategies and ignoring warning alerts from Indian exchanges.
Kashmiri apple farmers are facing a difficult situation as record heat and dry spells threaten their annual harvest. The region, known for its rich apple production, is experiencing a worrying trend as the changing climate jeopardizes the livelihoods of these farmers. With extreme weather conditions becoming more frequent, farmers are left to worry about the future of their crops and the impact on their business. Join our WhatsApp channel to stay updated on the latest news and videos from Kashmir's apple farms.
Railway Recruitment Board (RRB) has finally released the highly anticipated RRB Group D result scorecard on December 27, 2022. Candidates can now check their results by visiting the official website of RRB at rrbcdg.gov.in. Keep yourself updated with the latest developments by clicking on the provided link.
Under the 'Pratibhashali Vidyarthi Protsahan Yojana', the Madhya Pradesh government has distributed a total of Rs 235.58 crore to 94,234 meritorious students who scored 75 per cent or more marks in their Class 12 board exams. This initiative aims to support the students' education and equip them with necessary tools like laptops to help them excel in their academic pursuits. Since its launch in 2009-10, the scheme has benefitted over 4.3 lakh students with a total disbursement of over Rs 1,080 crore.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has taken action against US-based Jane Street Group for allegedly manipulating the Indian stock market. SEBI claims that the group carried out large-scale, aggressive trades on expiry days, particularly targeting Bank Nifty and Nifty 50 index constituents. This strategy involved buying stocks in the morning and selling them in the afternoon, resulting in a net options profit of Rs 673 crore on just January 17, 2024.
SEBI has ordered the impounding of Rs 4,840 crore in unlawful gains and the freezing of all debit transactions linked to Jane Street entities, including JSI Investments Pvt Ltd, Jane Street Singapore Pte Ltd, and Jane Street Asia Trading Ltd. This comes after a 105-page interim order by SEBI accused Jane Street and its affiliates of using high-frequency algorithmic trading strategies to artificially influence index levels and make profits from derivatives. Although not directly named, Nuvama Wealth Management's association with Jane Street has raised concerns among investors. As a result, Nuvama's stock plunged by Rs 838.00 in a single session, with the broader market also feeling the effects as the Nifty Capital Markets index fell by 2%.
IT giant Infosys has started an internal campaign to encourage employees to prioritize their health and disconnect after work hours. In a sharp contrast to co-founder Narayana Murthy's previous statement advocating for a 70-hour workweek, the move signals a shift in the company's stance on work-life balance. HR is now tracking work hours and sending health-focused reminder emails to prevent burnout and long-term health issues in the Indian IT sector. The campaign's success and impact on employee well-being will be closely monitored by the 323,000+ employees worldwide.
As Australian beef exports continue to reach new heights, official data shows a significant increase in volume for the first half of the year and a record-breaking 1.44 million tonnes shipped in the 2024-2025 financial year. This growth is attributed to a combination of factors, including declining US beef production, trade access issues, tariffs, and strong international demand. Despite the impact of drought on production in some parts of the country, Australia is well-positioned to take advantage of the current market dynamics.
SEBI has taken stringent action against US-based trading firm Jane Street, barring them from Indian markets due to accusations of manipulating equity derivatives through high-frequency trading. In just one day, Jane Street earned Rs 734.93 crore in profits through manipulative trades, leading to a sharp decline in BSE Ltd. stock prices. Technical analysis reflects a negative trend for BSE with a potential downward movement towards the 50 EMA at Rs 2,550.
A group of female passengers have approached the Karnataka High Court, requesting that bike taxi services, including those offered by Ola, Uber, and Rapido, be allowed to operate in Bengaluru again. The group argues that the ban on bike taxis, imposed by the state government citing safety concerns, has negatively impacted women commuters, who rely on these services for affordable and convenient travel. The court hearing has been postponed, with the final decision expected to shape the future of bike taxis in Karnataka.