In a landmark judgement, the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of sub-categorization within Scheduled Castes for the purpose of granting quotas. CJI DY Chandrachud emphasized that the principle of equality guarantees factual and not formal equality, allowing for valid classification if there is an "intelligible differentia" and a "rational relation" to the law's objective. The verdict examines whether Article 14 (right to equality) is violated by sub-classification.
Equality: A Principle Anew
Background
The concept of equality has been a cornerstone of the Indian Constitution since its inception. Article 14 of the Constitution guarantees the right to equality for all citizens, prohibiting discrimination based on race, caste, religion, sex, place of birth, or any other ground. However, the interpretation of equality has been a subject of ongoing debate.
Landmark Supreme Court Judgment
In a recent landmark judgment, the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of sub-categorization within Scheduled Castes (SCs) for the purpose of granting quotas. This decision has reignited the discussion on the nature and scope of equality in India.
Principle of Equality
Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, who authored the judgment, emphasized that the principle of equality guarantees factual, not formal equality. This means that the law can distinguish between groups if there is an "intelligible differentia" (a relevant and reasonable distinction) and a "rational relation" to the law's objective.
In the instant case, the court held that the sub-categorization of SCs for the purpose of quotas is valid because it seeks to address specific disadvantages faced by certain sub-groups within the SC community. The court also noted that the sub-categorization is based on objective criteria such as geographical location, occupation, and economic status.
Critics' Arguments
Critics of the judgment argue that it violates the fundamental principle of equality by creating further divisions within a marginalized community. They contend that quotas should be granted based on overall economic and social disadvantage, rather than caste or sub-caste.
FAQs
1. What is the basis for the sub-categorization of SCs?
The sub-categorization is based on objective criteria such as geographical location, occupation, and economic status.
2. How does the judgment justify sub-categorization?
The court held that sub-categorization is valid if there is an "intelligible differentia" and a "rational relation" to the law's objective. In this case, the objective is to address specific disadvantages faced by certain sub-groups within the SC community.
3. Does the judgment erode the principle of equality?
The judgment upholds the principle of factual equality, which allows for valid classification based on relevant distinctions.
4. How will the judgment impact quotas for SCs?
The judgment will ensure that quotas for SCs are distributed more equitably among different sub-groups within the community.
5. What are the implications for other marginalized groups?
The judgment may have implications for the sub-categorization of other marginalized groups, such as Other Backward Classes (OBCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs).
President Trump's meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has led to optimism regarding the ongoing ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas. Trump hinted at "progress" in the planned move to relocate Palestinians out of Gaza, stating that they are working with other countries to give Palestinians a "better future." However, the relocation plan has been met with criticism and accusations of ethnic cleansing. Trump's foreign envoy is expected to join the talks soon, and Trump believes there is a "good chance" of reaching a deal this week.
The controversial leader of Dera Sacha Sauda, Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, has been granted parole for the 21st time and was met by his close associate Honeypreet in Sirsa. This comes as the sect leader continues to face legal troubles for various cases, including the rape of two disciples and the murder of a journalist. Following significant violence and protests in 2015, Gurmeet Ram Rahim was sentenced to 20 years in prison for the rape case and was also convicted for the murder in 2019. He will now only appear through video conferencing for cases related to the 2015 sacrilege incidents, while he remains imprisoned in Rohtak's Sunaria Jail.
Leicestershire Police have charged an 18-year-old for multiple offenses after officers used a controlled technique to stop a moped rider during a pursuit. The incident, which took place in Shepshed, resulted in the rider being charged with possessing a weapon, driving without a license, and failing to stop for police. The officers involved have reminded motorists of the importance of following police instructions during traffic stops.
In a highly unorthodox move, US President Donald Trump made a social media announcement on Monday declaring that a 25% tariff will be imposed on imports from Japan and South Korea starting August 1. The announcement, which also included copies of letters sent to the leaders of the two countries, issued a warning that any retaliatory actions could result in even steeper tariffs. The White House has also stated that similar letters will be sent to 12 more nations, while Trump has signaled possible flexibility in the newly announced tariffs if Japan and South Korea revise their trade policies. However, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has maintained a firm stance, signaling tough negotiations ahead. This latest tariff saga follows earlier measures imposed by Trump on April 2, resulting in limited progress in trade negotiations.
Outrage and scrutiny surround a report from the Justice Department and FBI stating that Jeffrey Epstein did not have a "client list" and likely took his own life in prison. Billionaire Elon Musk publicly voiced frustrations with the Trump administration's lack of action against those involved in Epstein's child sex trafficking crimes. Trump's supporters are demanding answers and questioning if top officials are being deceitful about the case.
Recently released CCTV footage sheds light on Jeffrey Epstein's final moments in his prison cell before his alleged suicide. The video shows the disgraced billionaire being escorted to his cell by a guard in an orange jumpsuit, about 11 hours before his death. Investigations by the FBI and US DoJ have concluded that Epstein died by suicide and there is no evidence of him possessing a "client list" to blackmail powerful figures. However, conspiracy theorists continue to allege that Epstein was murdered. The newly disclosed footage captures the last known interactions in the vicinity of Epstein's cell, further fueling public interest in the controversial case.
The FBI has officially concluded its investigation into Prince Andrew's connections to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein after a comprehensive review ordered by the Department of Justice. Victims of Epstein have expressed anger and disappointment over the decision, as they were hoping for justice and accountability for the years of abuse they suffered. However, officials maintain that there is no evidence to suggest any wrongdoing on the part of any third parties, including Prince Andrew, and are set to release CCTV footage of Epstein's final days in custody to dispel any conspiracy theories surrounding his death.
The Department of Justice has released a detailed report on the death of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, confirming that he died by suicide and dismissing theories of foul play or a secret "client list" of powerful individuals allegedly involved in illegal activities. The investigation found no evidence to support these claims, debunking popular conspiracy theories surrounding Epstein's death. This new evidence addresses long-standing speculation and challenges narratives about Epstein's death, shedding light on the truth behind this high-profile case.
The official Twitter account of Reuters, a renowned international news agency, was temporarily blocked in India on July 5. This led to speculations about the reasons behind the move, but the Indian government clarified that it had not requested for the account to be withheld. After the government's intervention, the account was restored, bringing an end to the controversy.
In response to Trump's criticism of his newly-launched America Party, tech mogul Elon Musk cites a quote from Frank Herbert's book, Dune, and declares that his party is the solution to the current political duopoly in the United States. Musk has been vocal about his opposition to Trump's economic policies, specifically the newly-signed tax and spending bill. The tension between the two has escalated with Trump threatening to deport Musk and reduce government contracts for his companies. However, Musk remains determined to make a difference through the influence of the America Party in key Senate and House races.