In a hearing on a plea for homeless shelter homes, the Supreme Court criticized the practice of announcing freebies by governments and political parties ahead of elections. The court highlighted that this approach is leading to a lack of willingness to work, particularly in states like Maharashtra where the labor force is drying up. The counsel argued that these policies only benefit the rich, while Justice Gavai cautioned against making political speeches in court and stressed the need to make the poor a part of mainstream society.
Supreme Court Criticizes Political 'Freebies'
Introduction
The Supreme Court of India has recently criticized the practice of political parties and governments announcing freebies ahead of elections. In a hearing related to a plea for homeless shelters, the court highlighted the negative consequences of such policies, including a diminished willingness to work and a shrinking workforce.
Background
In recent years, it has become common for political parties in India to promise freebies, such as household items, food grains, electricity subsidies, and cash transfers, in their election campaigns. These promises are often made with the intention of attracting voters and gaining political support.
The Court's Observations
During the hearing, the Supreme Court expressed concern over the long-term effects of freebies on the economy and society. The court noted that such policies create a dependency mindset among beneficiaries and lead to a lack of motivation to seek employment.
Justice Surya Kant, one of the judges on the bench, emphasized that freebies are "not sustainable in the long run" and that they "weaken the moral fiber" of the people. He warned that these policies could result in a situation where "incentivized idleness" becomes the norm.
The Counsel's Argument
The counsel representing the petitioner in the case argued that the distribution of freebies only benefits the wealthy and does not address the underlying causes of poverty. He contended that such policies create a false sense of entitlement among the poor and perpetuate their dependence on government assistance.
Justice Gavai's Caution
Justice Abhay Oka, another judge on the bench, cautioned against making political speeches in court and stressed the need to focus on practical solutions that will genuinely benefit the poor. He emphasized the importance of empowering the poor through job creation and educational opportunities.
Top 5 FAQs and Answers
1. What are freebies? Freebies are goods, services, or cash transfers that are promised or provided by governments or political parties without any requirement of work or compensation.
2. Why is the Supreme Court criticizing freebies? The Supreme Court is concerned that freebies create a dependency mindset, reduce the willingness to work, and put a strain on government finances.
3. What are some examples of freebies? Examples of freebies include:
4. What has the government said about freebies? The government has defended its freebie policies, arguing that they are necessary to address the needs of the poor and vulnerable. However, it has also acknowledged the concerns raised by the Supreme Court.
5. What is the likely impact of the Supreme Court's criticism? It remains to be seen whether the Supreme Court's criticism will have a significant impact on the practice of freebies in Indian politics. However, the court's observations have sparked a public debate and raised awareness about the potential risks associated with such policies.
Amid the heated debate over language in India, Janasena Party chief and Andhra Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan has urged for the protection and promotion of the country's linguistic diversity. Emphasizing the importance of multiple languages, including Tamil, Kalyan made a statement against the Union government's recent move to make Hindi the sole official language of India. This call for preserving India's diversity comes as tensions rise between the Centre and Tamil Nadu over language rights.
On the occasion of Jana Sena Party's 12th foundation day, party leader and Andhra Pradesh Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan addressed a large crowd at a public meeting held in Chitrada. Reflecting on the party's journey, he spoke about the challenges they have faced and highlighted the role of women in the movement. He also asserted that despite past political repression, the party has emerged victorious and is committed to working for the welfare of all.
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking at a Purim celebration at the National Police Academy, drew a comparison between the story of Purim and the current conflict between Israel and Iran. He warned that the Jewish state must be prepared to defend itself against the modern-day Persian threat, just as the Jewish people were saved from annihilation in Persia. This came in the wake of the passing of Maxine Jacobs Bally, a long-time resident of Columbus and a beacon of love and warmth for her family and friends, who passed away on Feb. 7, 2025.
Infosys co-founder NR Narayana Murthy has spoken out against the practice of offering freebies by political parties in India, stating that job creation instead of handouts is the key to eliminating poverty. He also suggested that government benefits should come with incentives or conditions to encourage positive outcomes. This comes after his previous recommendation for young people to be prepared to work long hours sparked a debate last year.
Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman criticizes Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin's decision to remove the rupee symbol from the state's 2025-26 Budget logo, calling it an example of language and regional chauvinism. She points out that the rupee symbol was officially adopted in 2010 when the DMK was part of the ruling alliance at the Centre and warns that this decision reflects a dangerous mindset that weakens Indian unity. Sitharaman also reminds elected representatives of their constitutional duty to uphold the nation's sovereignty and integrity.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin has accused the Bharatiya Janata Party of trying to impose Hindi on the state through the National Education Policy. He has been speaking out against the policy, calling it an attempt to develop Hindi instead of India. The centre has not responded to his recent attacks, with Stalin questioning Prime Minister Narendra Modi's commitment to federalism and accusing the BJP of seeking political revenge.
In a recent development, the Delhi High Court has ordered Google and social media platforms X and Meta to remove a video posted by journalist and YouTuber, Shyam Meera Singh, which criticizes spiritual leader Jaggi Sadhguru and his organization, Isha Foundation. The Court also directed Singh to refrain from publishing or sharing the video further. The decision was made on the grounds that the video contained unverified and potentially harmful information, and the title was deemed to be clickbait. The suit, filed by Isha Foundation, argued that the video was released with malicious intent just before a significant event involving Union Home Minister Amit Shah as the Chief Guest.
The Union government has proposed a new bill, the Immigration and Foreigners Bill, in the Lok Sabha with the aim of better controlling India's borders and managing the entry and exit of foreigners. The bill, which will replace four existing laws, has already sparked concerns from critics who fear potential violations of fundamental rights and hindering the inflow of talent to the country. Despite this, the government seems determined to move forward with its plans to establish a Bureau of Immigration.
Artisans from across the state of Maharashtra have gathered in Parel's Bhivajirao Nare Park to protest against the Bombay High Court's ban on the use of Plaster of Paris (PoP) Ganesh idols. According to the court, only eco-friendly clay idols should be used for the festival, but the artisans argue that these idols are not strong enough for tall installations, which are a main characteristic and tourist attraction of the festival. They claim that the ban is being influenced by competitors in the clay idol business, and are exploring all options to reverse the ban. The High Court's judgement in January led to the installation of artificial ponds for the visarjan (immersion) of PoP idols in Mumbai.
On the anniversary of the historic Dandi March, Prime Minister Narendra Modi paid tribute to all those who played a crucial role in India's fight for freedom. He emphasized the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi and the unwavering commitment to truth and non-violence displayed by the participants, stating that their legacy continues to inspire generations.