Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah called out Union Minister Amit Shah for his disparaging remarks about B R Ambedkar, stating that Shah would have been a "scrap dealer" if not for the Constitution. Amidst din in the assembly, Siddaramaiah said Shah's words reflect the true opinion of the BJP and Sangh Parivar about Ambedkar. He also congratulated Shah for openly revealing their innermost thoughts. The House was adjourned twice as both the Congress and BJP MLAs sparred over the issue.
Ambedkar and the BJP: A History of Disparagement
The recent comments by Union Minister Amit Shah regarding B.R. Ambedkar, the architect of the Indian Constitution, have reignited a long-standing debate about the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) attitude towards the Dalit leader.
Shah's Remarks
On August 11, 2023, Shah dismissed Ambedkar as a "half-educated" scholar who "collected whatever was convenient for him from Manu's laws and Western literature." He claimed that Ambedkar's Constitution had failed to unite the country.
Siddaramaiah's Response
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah denounced Shah's remarks as disparaging and reflective of the BJP's true stance on Ambedkar. He asserted that without the Constitution, Shah would have been a "scrap dealer," emphasizing the importance of Ambedkar's work in shaping India's democratic fabric.
Historical Context
The BJP's hostility towards Ambedkar has roots in the party's ideological affiliation with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). The RSS, a Hindu nationalist organization, has a long history of opposing affirmative action policies that benefit Dalits and other marginalized groups.
In the past, BJP leaders such as L.K. Advani and Narendra Modi have also made controversial statements about Ambedkar. In 2014, Modi described Ambedkar as a "bridegroom's father" who had "married" the Constitution to the Hindu religion.
Political Implications
Shah's remarks have sparked outrage among Dalit organizations and other opposition parties. The incident has also raised questions about the BJP's commitment to social justice and equality.
The Congress party, which traditionally enjoys strong support from Dalits, is attempting to capitalize on the controversy by portraying the BJP as anti-Dalit. The BJP, on the other hand, is likely to defend Shah's comments as a reflection of his personal opinion.
Top 5 FAQs and Answers
Why did Amit Shah make derogatory remarks about B.R. Ambedkar?
How did Siddaramaiah respond to Shah's remarks?
What is the historical context of the BJP's hostility towards Ambedkar?
What political implications do Shah's remarks have?
What is the likely response of the BJP to the criticism of Shah's remarks?
Former foreign secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla, Kerala BJP leader C Sadanandan Master, Delhi-based historian Meenakshi Jain and prominent lawyer Ujjwal Nikam have all been nominated to the Rajya Sabha. Nikam is best known for his role as the special public prosecutor in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks case, and his nomination has sparked debate among political circles. These four individuals join a growing list of prominent personalities appointed to the upper house of the Indian Parliament.
The proscribed rebel group ULFA-I has claimed that the Indian Army carried out a series of drone and missile attacks on their mobile camps along the Myanmar border. The attacks allegedly resulted in the death of several leaders, including the 'chairman' and 'brigadier' of the outfit, and injured many others. However, the Indian Army has denied any knowledge of such an operation. Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has also denied involvement of the state police and promised clarity on the situation later in the day.
President Droupadi Murmu has exercised her power under Article 80(1)(a) of the Constitution to nominate four individuals to the Rajya Sabha, including prominent lawyer Ujjwal Nikam and former Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla. The appointments were made to fill vacancies created by the retirement of previously nominated members. This move marks the President's recognition of individuals with special knowledge or practical experience in fields such as literature, science, art, and social service. Among the nominees are Ujjwal Nikam, known for his role as Special Public Prosecutor in the 26/11 Mumbai terror attack case, and Harsh Vardhan Shringla, who has held several key diplomatic assignments.
President Droupadi Murmu has nominated veteran public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam to the Rajya Sabha, recognizing his exceptional contributions to the Indian judicial system. With a career spanning over four decades, Nikam has established a respectable reputation for prosecuting high-profile criminal cases, particularly those involving terrorism and national security. His nomination is seen as a move to bring legal expertise and prosecutorial experience to the legislative domain, and Nikam is expected to contribute significantly to legal reforms and national security discussions in Parliament.
Former Indian Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla and historian Meenakshi Jain have been nominated to the Rajya Sabha, the Upper House of the Indian Parliament. Shringla, who has a distinguished career as a diplomat and served as India's foreign secretary, brings his unique perspectives to the Upper House, while Jain, who has been recognized for her work in history, education, and literature, will add valuable insights to parliamentary proceedings. Both nominees have been congratulated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on their nomination, highlighting their expertise and contributions to their respective fields.
The Rajya Sabha is set to witness a major shake-up in 2026 with 75 seats up for election, including those of Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, former Prime Minister HD Deve Gowda, and two key ministers from Uttar Pradesh. Maharashtra, Jharkhand, and Andhra Pradesh will also see significant changes with leaders like Sharad Pawar, Shibu Soren, and Sana Satish Babu retiring. The upcoming elections will have a significant impact on the composition of the Upper House.
Lord Neil Kinnock, former leader of the Labour Party, has suggested imposing a 2% tax on assets worth more than £10 million. This move could potentially provide the government with an estimated £10-11 billion in additional revenue. However, a No10 source has distanced the government from the idea, stating that Lord Kinnock was expressing his personal views. The call for a wealth tax comes amidst pressure on the Chancellor to balance the budget after U-turns on cuts to disability benefits and winter fuel payments.
The Indian President has made four nominations to the Rajya Sabha under Article 80(1)(a) of the Constitution to fill vacancies left by retired members. These nominations include well-known Bharatiya Janata Party leader and advocate Ujjwal Nikam, who previously served as a special public prosecutor in high-profile cases. These fresh appointments are crucial for the Rajya Sabha to have diverse expertise and perspectives from individuals with special knowledge or practical experience in fields such as literature, science, art, and social service.
Amid the chaos surrounding the passage of the Republican tax bill, the fate of Mason General Hospital in Washington state hung in the balance. Providers are now bracing for the long-term effects of the "One Big Beautiful" bill, which could lead to millions of Americans losing their health insurance by 2034. With Washington expected to be among the hardest hit, experts warn of potential service cutbacks, layoffs, and even closure of hospitals. The devastating impacts will not only affect Medicaid beneficiaries, but also all Washingtonians' access to healthcare.
Karnataka has passed a controversial bill that seeks to curb the spread of fake news on social media, empowering a committee headed by the state Information & Broadcasting Minister to identify and penalize offenders. Social media users found guilty of posting "fake news" could face up to seven years in prison and a hefty fine of Rs 10 lakh. However, critics argue that the bill's vague and broad definitions of fake news and misinformation could lead to the suppression of free speech and artistic expression. This comes after a similar provision in the amended IT Rules 2021 was struck down by the Bombay High Court for lacking judicial oversight, raising concerns about government overreach.