FIFA has announced that Saudi Arabia will host the 2034 World Cup, while the 2030 tournament will be co-hosted by Spain, Portugal, and Morocco with the opening three matches in South America. The decision has sparked controversy due to "sportswashing" claims against Saudi Arabia and the combined vote for both tournaments with no separate vote available. The bid was uncontested and received support from the English, Scottish, and Welsh Football Associations. Football fans and critics alike are divided on the decision, with some questioning the fairness and integrity of FIFA's bidding process.
Saudi Arabia to Host 2034 FIFA World Cup Amid Controversy
FIFA, the governing body of international football (soccer), has announced that Saudi Arabia will host the 2034 World Cup. The decision has raised eyebrows due to the country's human rights record and allegations of "sportswashing."
Historical Perspective
Saudi Arabia has a long history of hosting major sporting events. In 2019, the country hosted the Super Cup, a match between the winners of the UEFA Champions League and the UEFA Europa League. It also won the bid to host the 2025 Asian Games.
2034 World Cup
Saudi Arabia's bid for the 2034 World Cup was uncontested, as no other countries submitted a proposal. The decision was made by FIFA's governing council, which voted in favor of the Saudi bid.
Controversy
The decision to award the World Cup to Saudi Arabia has been met with controversy. Critics argue that the country's human rights record, including restrictions on freedom of expression and the treatment of women, makes it an unsuitable host for a major sporting event.
Others have accused FIFA of "sportswashing," a practice in which authoritarian regimes use major sporting events to improve their image on the world stage.
Co-Hosted 2030 Tournament
In addition to awarding the 2034 World Cup to Saudi Arabia, FIFA also announced that the 2030 tournament will be co-hosted by Spain, Portugal, and Morocco. The three countries had jointly submitted a bid for the event.
Top FAQs
1. Why did FIFA award the 2034 World Cup to Saudi Arabia?
FIFA has not publicly stated its reasons for awarding the 2034 World Cup to Saudi Arabia. However, it is believed that the country's financial resources and its willingness to invest heavily in infrastructure played a role in the decision.
2. What are the allegations of "sportswashing" against Saudi Arabia?
Critics argue that Saudi Arabia's bid for the 2034 World Cup is an attempt to improve the country's image on the world stage and distract from its human rights record. They point to the fact that the country has hosted other major sporting events in recent years, including the Super Cup and the Asian Games.
3. How did FIFA respond to these allegations?
FIFA has not publicly commented on the allegations of "sportswashing" against Saudi Arabia. However, it has stated that it "takes the issue of human rights very seriously" and that it will "continue to monitor the situation in Saudi Arabia closely."
4. What are the human rights concerns in Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia has a long history of human rights abuses, including restrictions on freedom of expression, the treatment of women, and the use of torture.
5. What is the future of the 2034 World Cup in Saudi Arabia?
It is too early to say what the future holds for the 2034 World Cup in Saudi Arabia. However, the controversy surrounding the decision to award the event to the country is likely to continue.
Pakistan's national cricket team is facing a concerning trend in T20 Internationals, with their number of defeats in 2024 reaching 16 in just 27 matches. This ties them with Rwanda for the most T20I losses of the year, despite Pakistan's strong cricketing history. The team's inconsistent performances and lack of cohesion have contributed to their difficulties, and changes in management and squad selection are expected in response to this troubling statistic.
During the third Test of the 2024/25 Border-Gavaskar Trophy, the ongoing rain became too much for Australian pacer Mitchell Starc to handle. With the dominant Aussies looking to wrap up the match, Starc was seen visibly frustrated as the ground staff had to bring out the covers yet again. Fans took to X (formerly Twitter) to express their reactions, with some noting how Starc's reaction was relatable to every fan watching the match. However, others pointed out the advantage that the interruptions may be giving to the bowlers over the batters.
The third day of the third test between India and Australia was interrupted by rain, halting India's batting at a precarious 48 for four. Skipper Pat Cummins took the prized wicket of Rishabh Pant after lunch, while Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood took three wickets in the morning session. With the series tied at 1-1, the rain interruptions have added to the challenges for both teams in this highly anticipated test match.
With the India-Australia series evenly poised at 1-1, all eyes are on Virat Kohli as he looks to reach a major milestone in the upcoming Gabba Test. The Indian captain is just one century away from joining legends Sunil Gavaskar and Alastair Cook in scoring a century at all five major venues in Australia. He also has a chance to surpass idol Sachin Tendulkar as the player with the most centuries in the Border-Gavaskar Trophy. Will Kohli break records and lead India to victory?
Mitchell Starc's attacking approach paid off as he took six wickets on the opening day of the pink-ball Test against India, dismissing them for 180 runs. The left-arm pace spearhead's strategy of hitting the stumps worked well, with his first ball dismissing centurion Yashasvi Jaiswal. Starc warned that they would need to stay focused as Jaiswal had bounced back in the second innings of the previous Test.
During the third day of the third Test between Australia and India, all-rounder Mitchell Marsh took an amazing catch to dismiss Indian batsman Shubman Gill. This catch was a major highlight of the day and showcased Marsh's outstanding fielding skills. The video of the catch was only available for viewers in the UK.
In a crucial third test match against England, New Zealand's Rachin Ravindra proved his worth as a cricketer by adapting his usual elegant style to a more disciplined approach. His 44 off 90 balls, along with a 107-run partnership with Kane Williamson, helped stabilize the New Zealand innings at a crucial point. Despite a tendency to flatter to deceive in the series so far, Ravindra's innings proved that his contribution to the team is not determined solely by big scores.
The India vs. Australia 3rd Test match has been delayed due to rain, with an inspection scheduled for 12:20 pm IST. Fans eagerly await the outcome as the teams gear up to continue their fierce battle at the Brisbane Cricket Ground. Stay tuned for live updates and scores from this exciting match!
Barcelona's title hopes took a hit as they stumbled to a 1-0 loss at home against Leganes, while Atletico Madrid pulled level with the Catalans with a 1-0 victory against Getafe. Barcelona's poor form continued as they lost three of their last six league games, putting their lead at risk. Leganes' early goal from a corner set the tone for the game as Barcelona failed to make a comeback, while Atletico Madrid continue their impressive winning streak.
Despite rain reducing play to just 30.2 overs over the first two sessions, Australia's seamers were able to create trouble for India's batters due to their higher release points compared to the Indian quicks. India's shot selection also contributed to their downfall, with three wickets falling to loose drives. Meanwhile, Australia added 40 runs to their overnight score before India took the last three wickets, with Jasprit Bumrah achieving a feat only achieved by Kapil Dev for India - taking 50 Test wickets in Australia. At Tea, India are tottering at 48 for 4, trailing Australia by 397 runs.