The Supreme Court of the US (SCOTUS) has finally made a decision after months of deliberation, ruling 8-1 that domestic abusers do not have the right to possess firearms. This decision has been long-awaited by advocates for Gun Violence Prevention (GVP) and brings hope for stricter gun control measures. Justice Clarence Thomas was the sole dissenter, raising questions about his reasoning in light of the demonstrated dangers of domestic abuse with firearms.
Domestic Abusers Denied Gun Rights: Supreme Court Ruling and Background
On June 23, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders cannot possess firearms. This 8-1 decision, with Justice Clarence Thomas dissenting, is a significant victory for advocates of gun violence prevention.
Background
Domestic violence is a pervasive issue in the United States, affecting millions of individuals. firearms are often used by abusers to intimidate, threaten, and harm their victims. Studies have shown that the presence of a firearm in a domestic violence situation increases the risk of homicide by fivefold.
In 1996, Congress passed the Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA), which prohibited individuals who had been convicted of domestic violence misdemeanors from possessing firearms. However, the law did not apply to individuals who had been convicted of domestic violence felony offenses or who were subject to domestic violence restraining orders.
The Supreme Court Ruling
In the case Bruen v. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, the Supreme Court ruled that a state may not prohibit an individual from possessing a firearm solely because the individual is subject to a domestic violence restraining order. The Court held that such a prohibition violates the Second Amendment right to bear arms.
The Court's majority opinion, written by Justice Stephen Breyer, emphasized the importance of the Second Amendment to individual self-defense. The opinion also noted that the government has a legitimate interest in preventing domestic violence, but that this interest does not justify a blanket ban on firearm possession by individuals subject to restraining orders.
Justice Thomas's Dissent
Justice Thomas dissented from the majority opinion, arguing that the government has a compelling interest in preventing domestic violence and that the Second Amendment does not prohibit laws that restrict gun ownership in order to protect public safety. Thomas pointed to the high rates of domestic violence-related homicides and the fact that abusers often use firearms to harm their victims.
Significance of the Ruling
The Supreme Court's ruling is a major victory for gun violence prevention advocates. The ruling makes it more difficult for domestic abusers to obtain firearms and helps to protect victims of domestic violence from further harm. The ruling is also likely to have a significant impact on future gun control legislation, as it sets a new precedent for how the Second Amendment applies to laws that restrict gun ownership.
FAQs
1. What does the Supreme Court ruling mean for domestic violence victims?
The ruling makes it more difficult for domestic abusers to obtain firearms, which helps to protect victims from further harm.
2. What does the ruling mean for gun owners who are subject to domestic violence restraining orders?
The ruling means that gun owners who are subject to domestic violence restraining orders must surrender their firearms to law enforcement.
3. What are the next steps following the ruling?
Advocates for gun violence prevention are calling for Congress to pass legislation that would expand background checks and close loopholes that allow domestic abusers to obtain firearms.
4. What was the rationale behind Justice Thomas's dissent?
Justice Thomas argued that the government has a compelling interest in preventing domestic violence and that the Second Amendment does not prohibit laws that restrict gun ownership in order to protect public safety.
5. How will the ruling affect future gun control legislation?
The ruling is likely to have a significant impact on future gun control legislation, as it sets a new precedent for how the Second Amendment applies to laws that restrict gun ownership.
After Susanna Reid faced backlash for questioning Labour MP Rachel Reeves about her clothing expenses, viewers of Good Morning Britain took to social media to voice their criticism towards the host's perceived hypocrisy. This incident occurred during a discussion of the Labour party's donation controversy, in which officials have been scrutinized for accepting large sums of gifts and hospitality. The show's co-host, Richard Madeley, was also involved in the conversation, but it was Reid's remarks that sparked the most outrage on Monday morning.
In a press conference, Tirupati MLA Arani Srinivasulu showed his support for Jana Sena chief and Deputy CM Pawan Kalyan's recent declaration to protect Sanatana Dharma. He stated that the declaration has come at a crucial time when the religion is facing threats from various forces. Srinivasulu also mentioned the steps taken by the NDA government to revamp the TTD administration and the recent findings of adulterated ghee. He welcomed the Supreme Court's direction and urged everyone to support Pawan Kalyan's "Dharma Poratam".
In the upcoming Lok Sabha Elections 2024, Rampal, a 50-year-old farmer from Misrikh, Uttar Pradesh, is making his political debut as an independent candidate representing the IND party. With no cases against him and a clean educational and financial background, Rampal hopes to bring change and development to his constituency. His profession as an agriculturist will also give him insights into the challenges and needs of the rural community, making him a strong contender for the upcoming elections.
The massive protest in Pakistan's capital, led by PTI, entered its second day as party members remain determined to not end the demonstration until instructed by leader Imran Khan. Amid this, rumors of confusion surrounding the KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur's location have been circulating, with the CM reportedly leaving the protestors in Islamabad and moving to KP House. The PTI's political committee has called out the CM's disappearance and has stated that there will be consequences if he is arrested, with plans for a new leader to take charge in that case.
As Haryana prepares for Assembly elections, all eyes are on the potential candidates for the Chief Minister position. Bhupinder Singh Hooda, a two-time CM, has emerged as the leader of the opposition and the frontrunner for the position. With his experience and success in previous elections, many are looking to Hooda as the potential savior for Congress in Haryana.
As India gears up for the 2024 elections, Union Home Minister Amit Shah stands out for addressing the most political rallies after Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Meanwhile, with the focus on Swachh Bharat Mission Urban 2.0, the government has ramped up efforts for better solid waste management and behavior change campaigns. The 'Swachhata Hi seva Abhiyan 2024' serves as a reminder for the importance of cleanliness in urban areas, with local residents urged to visit the swachhatahiseva.com website for a list of designated spots. The state's efforts for regular campaigns and public participation highlight the commitment towards sustainable cleanliness.
BJP MP Janardan Singh Sigriwal expressed confidence in the party's victory in the Haryana Assembly elections, citing the support for PM Modi. However, Congress candidate Vinesh Phogat remains optimistic and believes that the "atmosphere is positive" for the party. As of 5 pm, the voter turnout stands at 61%, with the highest in Mewat and the lowest in Faridabad.
Controversial Islamic preacher Zakir Naik caused a stir at an event in Pakistan when he abruptly exited the stage, sparking accusations of disrespect towards the country. The event, organized by the Pakistan Sweet Home Foundation, was meant to honor young orphaned girls, but Naik left when they were called on stage for felicitation. The incident sparked outrage and has reignited debates around Naik and his beliefs, with many questioning his actions and implications for Pakistan's relationship with other countries.
Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, currently serving a life sentence for rape and murder, has been granted parole for the fifth time before an election. With his followers claiming to have received instructions to vote en bloc, the dera chief's influence on voters in Punjab, Haryana, and Rajasthan cannot be ignored. This move comes after the dera dissolved its political wing last year and the Election Commission has banned the dera chief from indulging in any political activity. However, allegations of his influence on voters have been raised in the past as well, making this parole decision a contentious one.
In an inaugural address at the Hindu Spiritual and Seva Mela in Jaipur, Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar spoke out against the dangerous rise of religious conversions in India. He criticized a "sugar-coated philosophy" used to target vulnerable sections of society, and pointed to a larger conspiracy behind the organized conversions. Without naming anyone, Dhankhar expressed concern over certain individuals aligning with forces detrimental to the nation's interests. He urged for vigilance and swift action against those attempting to fragment India.