As the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) makes the headlines once again, All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen chief Asaduddin Owaisi criticizes the Modi government for not learning from the election results. He raises concerns over the future of Muslims, tribals, and Dalits who have been detained under the stringent law and holds the Congress responsible for enacting it. Owaisi also expresses disappointment in the BJP for making the UAPA even more stringent, despite his opposition.
UAPA: A Tool of Oppression or a Necessity for National Security?
The Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) has once again come under scrutiny following its use in the arrest and detention of several human rights activists and political dissenters in recent years. Critics argue that the law has been weaponized to suppress legitimate dissent and target minority communities, particularly Muslims.
Background
The UAPA was first enacted in 1967 to combat terrorism and other unlawful activities. It was amended several times over the years, with the most recent amendments being made in 2019. These amendments expanded the definition of terrorism and gave law enforcement agencies sweeping powers to arrest and detain individuals suspected of involvement in terrorist activities.
Current Concerns
The use of UAPA has become a major concern for civil society organizations and human rights groups. They argue that the law is being used to silence dissent and target individuals who are critical of the government. Several prominent activists and intellectuals have been arrested and charged under UAPA, including Anand Teltumbde, Varavara Rao, and Sudha Bharadwaj.
Critics also point out that the majority of those arrested under UAPA are from minority communities, particularly Muslims. They argue that this is evidence of selective and discriminatory enforcement of the law.
Government's Position
The government maintains that UAPA is a necessary tool for combating terrorism and other unlawful activities. It argues that the recent amendments to the law were made in response to the growing threat of terrorism in the country.
Top 5 FAQs and Answers
1. What is the UAPA?
The UAPA is a law that authorizes the Indian government to detain individuals suspected of being involved in terrorist activities. It also empowers the government to ban organizations that it believes are involved in terrorism.
2. Why is the UAPA controversial?
Critics argue that the UAPA has been weaponized to suppress legitimate dissent and target minority communities. They point to the fact that the majority of those arrested under UAPA are from minority communities, particularly Muslims.
3. What are the amendments to the UAPA that have caused concern?
The 2019 amendments to the UAPA expanded the definition of terrorism and gave law enforcement agencies sweeping powers to arrest and detain individuals suspected of involvement in terrorist activities. It also allowed the government to designate individuals as terrorists without trial.
4. What is the government's position on the UAPA?
The government maintains that UAPA is a necessary tool for combating terrorism and other unlawful activities. It argues that the recent amendments to the law were made in response to the growing threat of terrorism in the country.
5. What are the concerns about the use of UAPA in the cases of activists and intellectuals?
Critics argue that the use of UAPA to arrest and detain activists and intellectuals is an attempt to silence dissent and suppress criticism of the government. They point out that many of those arrested have not been charged with any specific crime and have been held in jail for months without trial.
After deciding to vacate the Budgam Assembly seat, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah has officially announced that he will be representing the Ganderbal constituency. He expressed his gratitude towards the people of Budgam and promised to continue working for them over the next five years. This move marks the end of the six-year period when J&K didn't have an Assembly and the NC, with support from other parties, will continue to hold the majority in the 95-member Assembly.
After 26 days of fasting, activist Sonam Wangchuk and his supporters have finally ended their protest after receiving assurance from the Ministry of Home Affairs regarding talks on Ladakh's demands. The protest was organized by Wangchuk and others to demand Sixth Schedule status for Ladakh, which aims to protect its cultural and environmental heritage. The Ministry has assured that the high-powered committee, which was holding talks with representatives from Ladakh, will resume discussions on December 3.
Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud, the 50th Chief Justice of India, is known for his progressive judgements and unwavering commitment to upholding the Constitution. With a legacy inherited from his father, the longest-serving CJI, Justice Chandrachud has become one of the most influential and respected judges in the Supreme Court. Notably, his lead judgement in the historic right to privacy case and his stance against the criminalisation of same-sex relations under Section 377 have solidified his reputation as a champion of individual rights and liberties.
Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy has expressed his confidence in becoming the Chief Minister of Karnataka again before 2028. He highlighted his previous 14-month stint as CM, promising to use his experience to deliver good governance if he gets a full five-year term. Kumaraswamy also criticized the current Congress government, urging the people to give him a chance to implement his plans for the state's prosperity.
Supreme Court Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud shared his experiences working on the controversial Ayodhya-Babri Masjid dispute case, stating that it was a difficult case to adjudicate. He revealed that he even prayed to God to help find a solution. This statement was made during his address to a gathering in a village in Khed taluka. Soon after, the 5-judge bench, led by Justice Chandrachud, delivered the verdict in November 2019, allowing the construction of a Ram Temple on the disputed site. The judge also mentioned that regular prayers and faith can lead to finding a solution in challenging cases.
The Russian Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, accused US President Joe Biden of using nuclear arms talks as a ploy to gain electoral points for Democratic Party candidate Kamala Harris. Lavrov also revealed that Moscow is against engaging in strategic stability talks without preconditions, as urged by the US, in order to prevent any unilateral military advantages. This comes ahead of the upcoming US presidential elections on November 5, in which Harris was selected as the Democratic nominee after Biden's withdrawal following a controversial televised debate with Republican nominee Donald Trump.
In a recent case at the Kerala High Court, an FIR against a university director accused of sexually harassing a female student during a youth festival was quashed. The court held that the physical contact that occurred was not sexual in nature, but rather part of a resistance effort to maintain discipline. The petitioner argued that the FIR was filed with malicious intent due to a delay in filing and strict event guidelines implemented by the university. The court cautioned the petitioner against any retaliatory measures that may hinder the complainant's studies.
Police sources have revealed that the Delhi Police is investigating a possible Khalistani link in the blast near a CRPF school in Rohini on Monday. This comes as a response to a group claiming responsibility for the explosion, as the police have sought details from messaging app Telegram. The blast caused damage to property but no injuries were reported, with an FIR mentioning the discovery of a "white powder" and CCTV footage of a suspect being recovered.
The 65th state-level Police Commemoration Day was observed in Chandigarh, where Director General of Police (DGP) Punjab Gaurav Yadav paid homage to the bravehearts who sacrificed their lives for the sake of the nation. Addressing the gathering, DGP Yadav highlighted the bravery and courage of the Punjab Police, and their efforts in maintaining peace and rooting out militancy. He also discussed the measures being taken to combat street crime and drug sales, and assured support to the families of martyrs.
The Supreme Court has put a hold on the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights' directive to discontinue funding for Madrasa Boards, following a plea filed by Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind. The plea argued that the NCPCR's action was discriminatory and unconstitutional, and violated several fundamental rights. The Commission, which is responsible for protecting children's rights across India, had recommended that non-Muslim children enrolled in madrasas be moved to mainstream schools under the RTE Act of 2009.