A couple who was seriously injured in a car accident involving an Uber driver lost their bid to take legal action against the company in court. The New Jersey court of appeals ruled in favor of Uber, stating that the arbitration provision in its terms and conditions was valid and enforceable. The couple's daughter had previously clicked "agree" to the updated terms of use while ordering food on the Uber Eats app. The ruling has raised concerns about the power of large corporations and the impact of hidden contractual language on consumer rights.
Uber Accident Victims Denied Lawsuit Due to Arbitration Clause
Background In September 2022, a New Jersey court of appeals ruled in favor of Uber in a case brought by a couple who were seriously injured in a car accident involving an Uber driver. The couple argued that Uber was liable for their injuries because the driver was negligent. However, the court ruled that the couple had agreed to an arbitration provision in Uber's terms and conditions when their daughter clicked "agree" while ordering food on the Uber Eats app. This provision requires disputes to be resolved through arbitration instead of court.
The Court's Reasoning The court found that the arbitration provision was valid and enforceable. The court noted that the couple's daughter had the opportunity to review the terms of service before clicking "agree." The court also found that the arbitration provision was not unconscionable, as it did not deprive the couple of their fundamental rights.
Consumer Rights Concerns The court's ruling has raised concerns about the power of large corporations and the impact of hidden contractual language on consumer rights. Critics argue that arbitration provisions can be used to unfairly deprive consumers of their right to seek redress in court. They also argue that consumers may not be aware of these provisions when they agree to terms of service online.
Top 5 FAQs
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has announced an extension for the deadline to file audit reports under the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2024-25. Initially set for September 30, 2024, the deadline has now been pushed to October 7, 2024, providing relief for taxpayers facing technical difficulties with electronic submissions. This decision applies to all taxpayers and was made in response to reports of malfunctioning on the e-filing portal. While the extension provides financial relief for those at risk of missing the initial deadline, experts warn against complacency and urge taxpayers to still submit their reports by the new deadline to avoid penalties.
In response to technical difficulties with electronic filing on the new Income Tax portal, the CBDT has announced a one-week extension for taxpayers to submit required tax audit reports. This will provide much needed relief for individuals and businesses whose original deadline was September 30. However, experts warn against complacency and recommend submitting reports within the extended deadline to avoid penalties.
Bata, a leading footwear company, launches a new brand campaign "Make Your Way" to commemorate its 130th anniversary. The campaign celebrates Bata's strong legacy and showcases its evolution as a top global brand. With "Make Your Way," Bata aims to solidify its position as an international favorite in the footwear industry.
The Income Tax Department has extended the deadline for filing audit reports for the 2023-24 financial year by seven days to October 7, 2024 due to technical difficulties faced by taxpayers. Tax experts have attributed the extension to high traffic on the filing portal, causing disruptions. This move comes amid increased reliance on electronic filing and highlights the need for a more robust system to handle such loads.
Indian digital transformation company Newgen Software announced that it has received three separate orders, with a combined value of over Rs. 18.8 crore. These orders include a Letter of Intent for a 10-year project, a Letter of Award for a 5-year project in the USA, and a purchase order for a 29-month project in Saudi Arabia. Despite this positive news, the company's stock closed 5.35% lower on Monday.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) announced an extension for the deadline to file tax audit reports, originally set for September 30, 2024. The new deadline of October 7, 2024, comes in response to the challenges faced by taxpayers with electronic submissions under the Income Tax Act. The extension benefits a wide range of taxpayers and is seen as a significant relief for those struggling with the complexities of the filing process. The CBDT's decision was prompted by reports of technical difficulties and invokes its authority to extend the submission date for all affected taxpayers.
After receiving an overwhelming response from investors, the share allotment for the KRN Heat Exchanger and Refrigeration IPO is expected to be finalised on September 30. The highly subscribed IPO received 211.68 times more bids than the available shares. Investors can check their allotment status through various sources, including the BSE, NSE, and the registrar's portal. The allotment announcement holds significant importance for those who applied for the IPO and are eagerly waiting for an update on their investment.
Despite leaving office, former US President Donald Trump continues to exert his influence on American companies, using tactics such as threats of tariffs and boycotts to push his agenda. The latest target is Deere, a long-standing and iconic American farm equipment brand. Experts warn that Trump's interference could ultimately harm American farmers and go against his own trade deal with China.
A recent ruling by state judges in New Jersey has prevented a couple, Georgia and John McGinty, from suing Uber for injuries they sustained in an accident. The judges cited a clause in Uber's terms of use stating that disputes must be settled through arbitration rather than in court. The McGintys claim they were unaware of this clause and had only agreed to it when their daughter, then 12, accepted the terms prior to ordering food on Uber Eats. This decision potentially sets a precedent for other cases involving companies with similar arbitration clauses.