The Madras High Court reprimanded AIADMK MP C.Ve. Shanmugam for using "unparliamentary" language against CM M.K. Stalin and other government officials. However, the case against him was quashed as the police had filed it under incorrect legal provisions. The judge stated that while Shanmugam's language was not appropriate for a member of parliament, it did not constitute the offences for which he was charged. The incident occurred during a token fast organized by the AIADMK party, where Shanmugam had made comments about the state government's inaction.
AIADMK MP Shanmugam's Remarks Against Stalin Quashed by Court
Background
The Madras High Court recently reprimanded AIADMK MP C. Ve. Shanmugam for using "unparliamentary" language against Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. K. Stalin and other government officials. However, the case against him was quashed as the police had filed it under incorrect legal provisions.
The incident occurred during a token fast organized by the AIADMK party in July 2021. Shanmugam had made comments about the state government's inaction in addressing various issues affecting the people of Tamil Nadu. His speech was widely criticized for its use of vulgar and abusive language.
Following the incident, the police registered a case against Shanmugam under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including those related to defamation, criminal intimidation, and promoting enmity between different groups. However, the Madras High Court quashed the case in December 2022, stating that the charges were not applicable to Shanmugam's remarks.
Court's Observations
While quashing the case, the Madras High Court Judge observed that Shanmugam's language was not appropriate for a member of parliament. However, the judge also stated that the remarks did not constitute the offenses for which he was charged. The judge further noted that the police had filed the case under incorrect legal provisions, which led to the quashing of the charges.
FAQs
1. What were the specific remarks made by Shanmugam that led to the controversy?
Shanmugam's remarks included vulgar and abusive language directed at CM Stalin and other government officials. He accused them of corruption, inaction, and suppressing the rights of the people of Tamil Nadu.
2. Why did the court quash the case against Shanmugam?
The court quashed the case because the police had filed it under incorrect legal provisions. The court stated that the charges of defamation, criminal intimidation, and promoting enmity were not applicable to Shanmugam's remarks.
3. What are the implications of the court's decision?
The court's decision may have implications for future cases involving the use of unparliamentary language by public figures. It suggests that such language, while inappropriate, may not necessarily constitute criminal offenses.
4. What is the AIADMK's reaction to the court's decision?
The AIADMK has condemned the court's decision, stating that it sends a wrong message to those who use abusive and vulgar language against elected officials. The party has also demanded that the government take action against Shanmugam for his remarks.
5. What is the significance of this case in the context of free speech in India?
This case raises questions about the limits of free speech in India. It highlights the tension between the right to express one's views and the need to maintain decorum and respect for public officials.
A video of a man claiming to be a member of the Lawrence Bishnoi gang has surfaced, in which he accuses politician Baba Siddique of having connections with notorious criminal Dawood Ibrahim. According to the man, Siddique was not a good man and had been charged under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act. He also provided details about the inner workings of the Bishnoi gang, including how they are contacted and recruited. However, the man in the video, Yogesh alias Raju, was recently arrested in connection to a different murder case and is not a named suspect in Siddique's murder. The Mumbai Police have arrested 10 individuals in connection to Siddique's case.
Former Maharashtra minister Baba Siddique was fatally shot outside his son's office in Mumbai on Saturday evening. Two suspects have been detained and the case has been handed over to the crime branch. Maharashtra Chief Minister Eknath Shinde has promised to ensure the arrest of all those involved, while the Opposition has condemned the state's "deteriorating" law and order situation, blaming the government for supporting criminals.
A meeting of the Joint Parliamentary Committee discussing the Waqf (Amendment) Bill turned chaotic when Trinamool Congress MP Kalyan Banerjee broke a glass bottle in response to an objection from a BJP MP. Banerjee has been suspended from the meeting for his behavior and opposition members walked out in protest. This is not the first instance of heated arguments over the contentious bill, leading to tension between ruling and opposition members.
Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, grandson of legendary politician Kalaignar, sticks to his statement comparing Sanatan Dharma to dengue and malaria. He defends it as a call to address the mistreatment of women in the Hindu religion and echoes the views of prominent Dravidian leaders. Despite facing protests and legal action, he refuses to apologize, stating he stands by his words.
In a surprising turn of events, a man accused of shouting anti-India slogans was granted bail by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on the condition that he salute the Indian flag 21 times a month, while also shouting "Bharat Mata ki Jai." This decision by the court has sparked debate and raised questions about the use of such unusual bail conditions in cases of sedition. Some are praising the court's decision, while others are concerned about potential infringement on the accused's rights. This case highlights the complexities and controversies surrounding issues of free speech and nationalism in India.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin has sparked a debate over population control laws by encouraging state residents to consider having more children. This comes after Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu recently proposed incentives for families to have more children, citing concerns over an ageing population and reduced political influence. The remark by Stalin has also raised questions about the delimitation process and its potential impact on southern states.
A court in Bareilly, India has sentenced five individuals, including the father and relatives of a 19-year-old woman, to life imprisonment for her murder after she resisted an arranged marriage. The woman was forced into the marriage against her will and tensions escalated between her and her in-laws leading to her father and his relatives pouring acid on her, resulting in her death. The case highlights ongoing issues of gender discrimination and violence against women in India, as well as disparities in education and resources between rural and urban areas.
Indigenous Australian senator Lidia Thorpe caused a stir on Monday when she harshly heckled King Charles during his visit to the Australian Parliament House in Canberra. As she was escorted out of the chamber, Thorpe continued to shout anti-colonial slogans, demanding the return of land that was taken from her people. The confrontation was captured on video and quickly went viral, causing shock and outrage among lawmakers and other dignitaries present.
Chief Ministers Chandrababu Naidu and MK Stalin are urging families in Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu to have more children, citing concerns about ageing population and potential loss of Lok Sabha seats in the upcoming delimitation process. While Naidu has even proposed legislation to incentivize larger families, Stalin has jokingly suggested aiming for 16 children for prosperity, highlighting the impact this population growth could have on the political landscape in India. Meanwhile, a recent government report predicts a significant rise in the number of elderly citizens in the country, particularly in the southern states.
At a mass marriage event in Chennai, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin referenced a Tamil adage and expressed concern over the impact of the Lok Sabha delimitation exercise on family planning. He urged couples to continue giving Tamil names to their children and reminded them that the traditional saying about acquiring 16 types of wealth does not refer to having 16 children. This comes just days after Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu controversially advocated for women to have more children to stabilize the population in his state.