The Madras High Court reprimanded AIADMK MP C.Ve. Shanmugam for using "unparliamentary" language against CM M.K. Stalin and other government officials. However, the case against him was quashed as the police had filed it under incorrect legal provisions. The judge stated that while Shanmugam's language was not appropriate for a member of parliament, it did not constitute the offences for which he was charged. The incident occurred during a token fast organized by the AIADMK party, where Shanmugam had made comments about the state government's inaction.
AIADMK MP Shanmugam's Remarks Against Stalin Quashed by Court
Background
The Madras High Court recently reprimanded AIADMK MP C. Ve. Shanmugam for using "unparliamentary" language against Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. K. Stalin and other government officials. However, the case against him was quashed as the police had filed it under incorrect legal provisions.
The incident occurred during a token fast organized by the AIADMK party in July 2021. Shanmugam had made comments about the state government's inaction in addressing various issues affecting the people of Tamil Nadu. His speech was widely criticized for its use of vulgar and abusive language.
Following the incident, the police registered a case against Shanmugam under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including those related to defamation, criminal intimidation, and promoting enmity between different groups. However, the Madras High Court quashed the case in December 2022, stating that the charges were not applicable to Shanmugam's remarks.
Court's Observations
While quashing the case, the Madras High Court Judge observed that Shanmugam's language was not appropriate for a member of parliament. However, the judge also stated that the remarks did not constitute the offenses for which he was charged. The judge further noted that the police had filed the case under incorrect legal provisions, which led to the quashing of the charges.
FAQs
1. What were the specific remarks made by Shanmugam that led to the controversy?
Shanmugam's remarks included vulgar and abusive language directed at CM Stalin and other government officials. He accused them of corruption, inaction, and suppressing the rights of the people of Tamil Nadu.
2. Why did the court quash the case against Shanmugam?
The court quashed the case because the police had filed it under incorrect legal provisions. The court stated that the charges of defamation, criminal intimidation, and promoting enmity were not applicable to Shanmugam's remarks.
3. What are the implications of the court's decision?
The court's decision may have implications for future cases involving the use of unparliamentary language by public figures. It suggests that such language, while inappropriate, may not necessarily constitute criminal offenses.
4. What is the AIADMK's reaction to the court's decision?
The AIADMK has condemned the court's decision, stating that it sends a wrong message to those who use abusive and vulgar language against elected officials. The party has also demanded that the government take action against Shanmugam for his remarks.
5. What is the significance of this case in the context of free speech in India?
This case raises questions about the limits of free speech in India. It highlights the tension between the right to express one's views and the need to maintain decorum and respect for public officials.
In the aftermath of a tragic stampede at the Sri Venkateswara Swami Temple in Tirumala, Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu has taken swift action by suspending officials and ordering a judicial probe into the incident. Criticizing the lack of responsibility and failure to assess the situation, Naidu's political opponents are also utilizing the incident to attack his government. Amidst the controversy, the temple's reputation for managing large crowds has taken a hit and measures are being suggested to prevent such incidents in the future.
President Droupadi Murmu expressed her distress and offered heartfelt condolences to the families of devotees who lost their lives in a stampede at Tirupati on Thursday. She also prayed for the speedy recovery of the injured and urged for better crowd management at religious places. The stampede occurred on Wednesday night as devotees were jostling for tickets at the Lord Venkateswara Swamy temple on Tirumala Hills for the Vaikunta Dwara Darshanam.
Greenland, the world's largest island, has been in the news for its melting glaciers and concerns about climate change. However, its strategic importance has also caught the attention of leaders like President Trump who recently expressed interest in purchasing the island. This is not a new idea, as previous presidents have also considered acquiring Greenland due to its location, potential energy resources, and role in the Arctic region. This article explores the history of this proposition and the current geopolitical considerations surrounding Greenland.
The Supreme Court has agreed to examine the Central Bureau of Investigation's appeal against the acquittal of Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh and four others in the murder case of former sect manager Ranjit Singh. The case, which has seen multiple twists and turns, has been referred to Justice Bela M. Trivedi's bench, which is already hearing a related petition filed by the victim's father. The CBI has argued that Ram Rahim orchestrated the murder after suspecting Singh of leaking an anonymous letter accusing him of sexual misconduct. The case has attracted widespread public attention due to Ram Rahim's involvement and frequent paroles from prison.
As Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader Supriya Sule voices the public demand for Minister Dhananjay Munde's resignation, a petition filed in the Bombay High Court by Dhananjay Deshmukh, brother of the murdered sarpanch, is withdrawn. The petition had alleged that Munde was linked to a criminal syndicate involved in the murder of his sibling in 2024. Sule cites a precedent in which a former Maharashtra CM resigned over a scam, calling for similar sensitivity towards this case.
The Election Commission of India has announced the schedule for the Delhi Assembly Elections 2025, with voting to take place on February 5 and counting of votes on February 8. The recent release of the final electoral roll shows a 1.09 per cent increase in the number of voters since the last draft. CEC Rajiv Kumar addressed concerns over EVMs and the election procedure, asserting the transparency and credibility of the Indian election process. The AAP, BJP and Congress are gearing up for a three-way battle, with the AAP currently in the lead after sweeping 2020 Delhi elections.
With the Delhi Assembly elections just around the corner, AICC Delhi in-charge Qazi Nizamuddin believes that the Congress party will successfully appeal to voters by focusing on key issues affecting citizens. He emphasized that the party only makes promises that have been fulfilled in Congress-ruled states and will prioritize cleaning the Yamuna, improving women's safety, reducing corruption, and addressing unemployment, all of which have been neglected by the current AAP government.
The BJP has refuted Delhi CM Atishi's accusation that her official residence was taken away by the Centre, stating that the allotment was withdrawn for her failure to take possession and ongoing CBI/ED investigation. The AAP leader, however, remains undeterred and vows to work for the people of Delhi even if it means operating from the streets. Delhi's 2025 election poll schedule has also been announced, with voting to take place on February 5 and results on February 8.
During a news conference in Mar-a-Lago, President-elect Donald Trump announced his plan to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. Trump believes that the new name has a "beautiful ring" and is more appropriate, especially given the current state of relations between the US and Mexico. While this isn't the first time renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America has been proposed, Trump's announcement has caused controversy and garnered attention.
The nation bids farewell to former President Jimmy Carter as his funeral procession takes place from the U.S. Navy Memorial to the Capitol in Washington D.C. The event was attended by many political figures and members of the public, paying their respects to the late President. Despite the solemn atmosphere, the streets were lined with people celebrating Carter's life and legacy.