India's top court is currently hearing petitions challenging a 1991 law that aims to preserve the character and identity of religious places of worship as they existed on the country's independence in 1947. The law has been a subject of controversy due to its impact on the dispute over the Babri Masjid, which was demolished in 1992. While some argue that the law infringes on religious freedom and secularism, others defend it as crucial in safeguarding the places of worship of religious minorities in a predominantly Hindu country. The court's decision on the issue, expected in February, could have wider implications for religious tensions in India.
Title: The Supreme Court of India's Landmark Decision on Religious Places of Worship
Introduction
In February 2023, the Supreme Court of India is expected to issue a landmark judgment on the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991. This law has been at the center of a heated debate surrounding the preservation of religious places of worship in India.
Background
The Places of Worship Act was enacted in 1991 as a response to the demolition of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya in 1992. The law aimed to prevent further religious conflicts by maintaining the status quo of religious places as they existed at the time of India's independence in 1947.
However, the law has been challenged by various religious groups. Some argue that it infringes on religious freedom by prohibiting the restoration of places of worship that were allegedly demolished or converted before 1947. Others defend the law as essential to safeguard the religious identity of minority communities in a predominantly Hindu country.
Current Developments
In May 2022, a three-judge bench of the Supreme Court began hearing a batch of petitions challenging the validity of the Places of Worship Act. The petitioners included Hindu organizations seeking the restoration of temples allegedly demolished by Muslim rulers.
The hearings have been marked by intense debate and legal arguments. Both sides have presented historical evidence and legal precedents to support their claims. The court has also heard from various religious leaders and academic experts.
Expected Verdict
The Supreme Court's verdict on the Places of Worship Act is expected to have a significant impact on religious tensions in India. If the court upholds the law, it would effectively prevent the restoration of disputed religious places. This could potentially lead to further unrest and conflict between different religious groups.
On the other hand, if the court strikes down the law, it could open the door for the reopening of old wounds and lead to a renewed cycle of violence.
FAQs
1. What is the Places of Worship Act, 1991?
The Places of Worship Act aims to preserve the character and identity of religious places of worship as they existed at the time of India's independence in 1947.
2. Why is the Places of Worship Act controversial?
Some argue that it infringes on religious freedom by prohibiting the restoration of places of worship that were allegedly demolished or converted before 1947. Others defend it as crucial in safeguarding the places of worship of religious minorities.
3. What are the main arguments in favor of the Places of Worship Act?
Proponents argue that the Act promotes religious harmony by preventing disputes over religious places. They also maintain that it safeguards the rights of religious minorities by preventing the restoration of places of worship that were allegedly demolished or converted in the past.
4. What are the main arguments against the Places of Worship Act?
Opponents of the Act argue that it infringes on the religious freedom of Hindus by preventing them from reclaiming places of worship that were allegedly destroyed or converted. They also contend that it perpetuates historical injustices and emboldens those who have engaged in religious violence in the past.
5. What is the expected impact of the Supreme Court's verdict?
The Supreme Court's verdict on the Places of Worship Act is expected to have a significant impact on religious tensions in India. If the law is upheld, it could effectively prevent the restoration of disputed religious places, potentially leading to further unrest and conflict. If the law is struck down, it could open the door for the reopening of old wounds and a renewed cycle of violence.
Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi is set to address a press conference on Thursday, where he is expected to present evidence of alleged vote theft in Indian elections. Gandhi has been vocal about the issue in previous speeches, accusing the government of using unfair means to form their power. He also claimed that the Election Commission is working in collaboration with the ruling party. The Congress promised to provide proof to back their claims and expose corruption in the Mahadevapura Assembly segment in Karnataka.
The centre has directed the removal of 138 YouTube videos and 83 Instagram posts related to Adani, citing a Delhi court order. The move comes amid ongoing disputes over the Adani Group's involvement in various projects. This action has been met with criticism, with some questioning the government's interference in online content.
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi revealed that the party has uncovered over 6,000 voter deletions in Aland constituency, Karnataka, ahead of the 2023 Assembly elections. According to their investigation, these deletions were not random or accidental but specifically targeted booths where the party was performing strongly. The deletions were carried out through fake applications and mobile numbers from outside Karnataka, raising concerns of an organized effort to manipulate the election process. Congress is calling for a thorough investigation to uphold the integrity of the democratic process.
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has strongly criticized Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, accusing him of protecting those involved in "vote chori" (vote stealing) and undermining democracy. He cited recent instances of voter deletions in Karnataka's Aland and fraudulent additions in Maharashtra's Rajura as evidence of systematic targeting of Congress voters. Speaking at a press conference, Gandhi urged for a fair and transparent election process to uphold the principles of democracy.
Congress MP and leader of opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, held a news conference and claimed that the Chief Election Commissioner is protecting those who are destroying the Constitution and democracy in India. He also alleged that a group of people is systematically cutting the votes of minority groups who vote for the Congress party. In response, politicians from different parties have dismissed his accusations and stated that he is making these statements out of desperation and frustration.
United States President Donald Trump has expressed delight at the suspension of ABC's late-night talk show hosted by Jimmy Kimmel, following backlash against his comments on the killing of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. Trump criticized Kimmel's talent and ratings, calling him a "total loser" and "Fake News" host. The show will reportedly be replaced by other ABC programs and has been taken off air indefinitely. This comes after Kimmel addressed the killing of Kirk during a monologue and condemned attempts to politicize the case.
On Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 75th birthday, various ministers, politicians, and private companies took out expensive advertisements in English newspapers to wish him. The Times of India had the most ads, followed by The Indian Express, Hindustan Times, and The Hindu. Some advertisements were placed by lesser-known politicians and political parties, while companies and trade associations also joined in to greet the PM. One advertisement even detailed the achievements of PM Modi in seven milestones.
In a powerful speech, Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai highlighted the essential role of human dignity in the Constitution and the judiciary's responsibility to uphold it. He emphasized that dignity forms the very core of fundamental rights and has been consistently upheld by the Supreme Court in landmark judgments. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla echoed this sentiment, stating that it is crucial for the government and judiciary to work together to deliver justice to the people.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin will be attending the grand celebration of Mupperum Vizha, which marks the birth anniversary of party founder CN Annadurai, social reformer Periyar, and DMK's founding day. Several prestigious awards, including the Periyar Award for Kanimozhi Karunanidhi, will be presented during the event, which has been designed like a fortress with a capacity to seat one lakh people. The stage is dominated by portraits of Chief Minister Stalin and Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, along with banners highlighting the achievements of the Tamil Nadu government.
The Vantara zoological rescue and rehabilitation centre, established by Reliance Foundation in Jamnagar, was under scrutiny by the Supreme Court following allegations of irregularities. On 15 September 2025, the Court accepted the findings of the special investigation team (SIT) in a "sealed cover," concluding that there were no violations of various laws and regulations. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh expressed admiration for the justice system's rare display of efficiency in this case, but also raised questions about the use of sealed covers in court proceedings.