The Supreme Court is set to address a variety of significant cases on Monday, October 21. These include cases involving the Delhi government's appeals related to appointments in the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission, as well as pleas filed by figures such as Arvind Kejriwal and Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind. Notable topics to be addressed include defamation proceedings against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and challenges to the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act. The Court will also consider a plea to remove the words "secular" and "socialist" from the Preamble of the Constitution and to enforce previous orders on firecracker regulations.
Supreme Court to Address Irregularities in Sushant Singh Rajput's Case
Background
The death of Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rajput in June 2020 sent shockwaves through India and sparked widespread speculation about the circumstances surrounding his demise. The initial investigation by the Mumbai Police was met with skepticism and allegations of a cover-up.
In August 2020, the Supreme Court ordered the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to take over the investigation into Rajput's death. The CBI has since filed a charge sheet alleging that Rajput was murdered by his girlfriend, Rhea Chakraborty, and five others.
Allegations of Irregularities
However, the CBI's investigation has also been plagued by allegations of irregularities. In September 2021, a forensic report revealed that the Mumbai Police had allegedly deleted crucial data from Rajput's mobile phone.
Other irregularities alleged include:
Supreme Court Hearing
The Supreme Court is set to address these allegations on Monday, October 21. The hearing will focus on a petition filed by Rajput's family, which seeks a fair and impartial investigation into his death.
Top 5 FAQs
Q1: What is the significance of the Supreme Court hearing?
A1: The hearing will determine the credibility of the CBI's investigation and the extent of irregularities that may have occurred. It could also have implications for the prosecution of those accused in Rajput's death.
Q2: What are the allegations of irregularities in the CBI investigation?
A2: The allegations include deletion of data from Rajput's mobile phone, pressure on witnesses, and failure to investigate certain aspects of the case.
Q3: What is the role of the Supreme Court in this case?
A3: The Supreme Court is responsible for ensuring that the investigation into Rajput's death is conducted fairly and impartially. It has the power to issue orders and directions to the CBI and other investigating agencies.
Q4: What is the motive behind the alleged irregularities?
A4: The motive behind the alleged irregularities is still unclear. It could be related to protecting those involved in Rajput's death or to manipulating the outcome of the investigation.
Q5: What are the possible outcomes of the Supreme Court hearing?
A5: The Supreme Court could order a further investigation into the alleged irregularities, direct the CBI to take specific steps, or dismiss the petition.
After deciding to vacate the Budgam Assembly seat, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah has officially announced that he will be representing the Ganderbal constituency. He expressed his gratitude towards the people of Budgam and promised to continue working for them over the next five years. This move marks the end of the six-year period when J&K didn't have an Assembly and the NC, with support from other parties, will continue to hold the majority in the 95-member Assembly.
After 26 days of fasting, activist Sonam Wangchuk and his supporters have finally ended their protest after receiving assurance from the Ministry of Home Affairs regarding talks on Ladakh's demands. The protest was organized by Wangchuk and others to demand Sixth Schedule status for Ladakh, which aims to protect its cultural and environmental heritage. The Ministry has assured that the high-powered committee, which was holding talks with representatives from Ladakh, will resume discussions on December 3.
Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud, the 50th Chief Justice of India, is known for his progressive judgements and unwavering commitment to upholding the Constitution. With a legacy inherited from his father, the longest-serving CJI, Justice Chandrachud has become one of the most influential and respected judges in the Supreme Court. Notably, his lead judgement in the historic right to privacy case and his stance against the criminalisation of same-sex relations under Section 377 have solidified his reputation as a champion of individual rights and liberties.
Union Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy has expressed his confidence in becoming the Chief Minister of Karnataka again before 2028. He highlighted his previous 14-month stint as CM, promising to use his experience to deliver good governance if he gets a full five-year term. Kumaraswamy also criticized the current Congress government, urging the people to give him a chance to implement his plans for the state's prosperity.
Supreme Court Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud shared his experiences working on the controversial Ayodhya-Babri Masjid dispute case, stating that it was a difficult case to adjudicate. He revealed that he even prayed to God to help find a solution. This statement was made during his address to a gathering in a village in Khed taluka. Soon after, the 5-judge bench, led by Justice Chandrachud, delivered the verdict in November 2019, allowing the construction of a Ram Temple on the disputed site. The judge also mentioned that regular prayers and faith can lead to finding a solution in challenging cases.
The Russian Foreign Minister, Sergey Lavrov, accused US President Joe Biden of using nuclear arms talks as a ploy to gain electoral points for Democratic Party candidate Kamala Harris. Lavrov also revealed that Moscow is against engaging in strategic stability talks without preconditions, as urged by the US, in order to prevent any unilateral military advantages. This comes ahead of the upcoming US presidential elections on November 5, in which Harris was selected as the Democratic nominee after Biden's withdrawal following a controversial televised debate with Republican nominee Donald Trump.
In a recent case at the Kerala High Court, an FIR against a university director accused of sexually harassing a female student during a youth festival was quashed. The court held that the physical contact that occurred was not sexual in nature, but rather part of a resistance effort to maintain discipline. The petitioner argued that the FIR was filed with malicious intent due to a delay in filing and strict event guidelines implemented by the university. The court cautioned the petitioner against any retaliatory measures that may hinder the complainant's studies.
Police sources have revealed that the Delhi Police is investigating a possible Khalistani link in the blast near a CRPF school in Rohini on Monday. This comes as a response to a group claiming responsibility for the explosion, as the police have sought details from messaging app Telegram. The blast caused damage to property but no injuries were reported, with an FIR mentioning the discovery of a "white powder" and CCTV footage of a suspect being recovered.
The 65th state-level Police Commemoration Day was observed in Chandigarh, where Director General of Police (DGP) Punjab Gaurav Yadav paid homage to the bravehearts who sacrificed their lives for the sake of the nation. Addressing the gathering, DGP Yadav highlighted the bravery and courage of the Punjab Police, and their efforts in maintaining peace and rooting out militancy. He also discussed the measures being taken to combat street crime and drug sales, and assured support to the families of martyrs.
The Supreme Court has put a hold on the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights' directive to discontinue funding for Madrasa Boards, following a plea filed by Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind. The plea argued that the NCPCR's action was discriminatory and unconstitutional, and violated several fundamental rights. The Commission, which is responsible for protecting children's rights across India, had recommended that non-Muslim children enrolled in madrasas be moved to mainstream schools under the RTE Act of 2009.