The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea seeking the disqualification of Prime Minister Narendra Modi from contesting elections for allegedly making religious appeals during a speech in Uttar Pradesh. The plea claimed that PM Modi had asked voters to vote for his party in the name of Hindu and Sikh deities and places of worship, violating the Model Code of Conduct. However, the court dismissed the petition, stating that there was no evidence of a violation and the Election Commission is obligated to make an independent decision on the matter. The plea had also mentioned PM Modi's statements regarding the Ram Temple construction, Kartarpur Sahib Corridor, and GST exemption for langars in gurdwaras.
Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea for PM Modi's Disqualification over Religious Appeals
Background:
The petition against Prime Minister Narendra Modi stemmed from his speech during the 2019 Lok Sabha election campaign in Uttar Pradesh. In the speech, Modi allegedly made religious appeals, asking voters to support his party in the name of Hindu and Sikh deities and places of worship.
Court's Ruling:
On June 22, 2023, the Delhi High Court dismissed the plea seeking Modi's disqualification. The court held that there was no evidence of a violation of the Model Code of Conduct, which prohibits candidates from making religious appeals during elections. The court further stated that the Election Commission is the appropriate authority to investigate and decide on such allegations.
Petitioner's Claims:
The petition, filed by a lawyer named Surinder Singh, had argued that Modi's statements amounted to a violation of the Model Code of Conduct because they appealed to religious sentiments. The petition cited specific statements made by Modi, including:
Court's Reasoning:
The court rejected the petition's arguments, stating that the statements made by Modi were not aimed at influencing voters on religious grounds. The court noted that Modi had made similar statements about other states and religions, and that his speech was not solely targeted at religious sentiments.
The court also emphasized the role of the Election Commission in such matters, stating that it is the Commission's responsibility to interpret and enforce the Model Code of Conduct.
FAQs:
1. What is the Model Code of Conduct?
The Model Code of Conduct is a set of guidelines issued by the Election Commission to ensure fair and ethical elections. It prohibits candidates and political parties from using religious appeals, spreading false information, or engaging in other unethical practices during the election campaign.
2. Can candidates be disqualified for violating the Model Code of Conduct?
Yes, candidates can be disqualified if they are found to have violated the Model Code of Conduct. However, the decision to disqualify a candidate is made by the Election Commission after conducting an investigation and considering all the evidence.
3. What were the specific allegations against PM Modi?
PM Modi was accused of making religious appeals by asking voters to support his party in the name of Hindu and Sikh deities and places of worship. The petition cited specific statements made by Modi during his election speech in Uttar Pradesh.
4. Why did the court dismiss the petition?
The court dismissed the petition because it found no evidence of a violation of the Model Code of Conduct. The court held that Modi's statements were not aimed at influencing voters on religious grounds and that the Election Commission is the appropriate authority to investigate such allegations.
5. What is the significance of the court's ruling?
The court's ruling reaffirms the authority of the Election Commission to interpret and enforce the Model Code of Conduct. It also demonstrates the importance of avoiding religious appeals during election campaigns to ensure fair and ethical elections.
Amid massive anti-government protests and a constitutional crisis in Nepal, top sources reveal that former chief justice Sushila Karki is likely to be announced as the interim Prime Minister. This decision comes after days of political turmoil and unrest, with President Ramchandra Paudel pushing for a solution within the constitutional framework. Army troops continue to patrol sensitive areas while representatives of the youth-led 'Gen Z' hold talks with military officials to finalize the transitional government.
The political world was rocked by tragedy as Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, was fatally shot while speaking at a Utah college. President Trump expressed his shock and sadness over the loss of his close ally, and offered his condolences to Kirk's wife Erika, who is said to be devastated by the news. While the investigation into the shooting is ongoing and the killer is still at large, the President has announced plans to award Kirk with the Presidential Medal of Freedom posthumously.
In recent years, three Asian countries – Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Nepal – have experienced widespread protests that have resulted in the ousting of a president in Sri Lanka and the resignation of a prime minister in Nepal. The common theme among these movements is public frustration with corruption, inequality, and economic disparities, as well as a growing resentment towards the ruling elite. These protests serve as a reflection of the people's dissatisfaction with the entrenched political systems in these countries.
During a Q&A session at Utah Valley University, Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk was shot and killed. A video of the incident showed police detaining a man who was not the shooter. After a manhunt, the real suspect was caught and confirmed by FBI Director Kash Patel. President Trump expressed his condolences and ordered flags to be flown at half-staff.
After a gunman opened fire on Charlie Kirk during a Q&A session at an outdoor event in Utah, the FBI director revealed that the suspect is now in custody. The shooting, which was initially thought to have been carried out by an older white man, is now being investigated as a political assassination. Utah Governor Spencer Cox also spoke out, expressing his condolences for Kirk and emphasizing the importance of free speech and debate in shaping ideas.
In Maharashtra, leaders from the ruling BJP party have expressed outrage over a proposed Muslim "halal lifestyle township" near Mumbai, accusing it of promoting "religious separation." However, this outcry ignores the ongoing issue of Muslim housing discrimination in India, where Muslims are routinely denied homes in Hindu-majority neighborhoods and often forced into ghettos. This hypocritical stance from the BJP only serves to further marginalize and exclude the Muslim community, while demonstrating a lack of understanding of the challenges they face.
The Indian parliament is currently in disarray as the ruling Modi government faces a boycott from the opposition INDIA alliance over the introduction of three anti-corruption bills. The situation escalated when a few opposition members resorted to tearing copies of the bills during proceedings, prompting the government to refer the bills to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC). However, this committee has now become a flashpoint, with the majority of the opposition refusing to participate. The Congress remains undecided, torn between internal opinions. This boycott is unprecedented in parliamentary history and has raised concerns about the opposition parties being portrayed as divided.
In a shocking revelation, it was uncovered that six people had been posing as "Arpit Singh" and holding full-time X-ray technician jobs in UP's health department for nearly nine years. Manipulating weak background checks and lack of coordination between district offices, these imposters drew separate salaries from each district, resulting in estimated losses exceeding Rs 4.5 crore to the public exchequer. The wrongdoing came to light during a digitisation drive when data comparison exposed the duplicate postings. A thorough investigation has been initiated and an FIR has been filed against the six "Arpit Singhs" at Wazirganj police station in Lucknow.
The carefully managed alliance between AIADMK and BJP in Tamil Nadu is facing turbulent times as the AIADMK leaders complain of increasing interference from the BJP into CM Palaniswami's leadership. Reports suggest that former AIADMK leader Panneerselvam is planning to start his own party, but has been asked to wait until December by the BJP. This has sparked talks of a possible exit from the NDA among the AIADMK ranks. The recent sacking of leader Sengottaiyan for demanding the return of expelled leaders further highlights the strained relations between the two parties. Some AIADMK leaders are advocating for an exit from the NDA in light of the current situation.
A new FIR has been filed against Dr Abhijeet Pandey, a dermatologist and assistant professor at RKDF College in Bhopal, for illegally running a cosmetic treatment clinic without proper registration and license. The case was filed on the complaint of a clerk, who reported that a team of officials had found Pandey using unregistered cosmetic treatment machines and illegally packaging and selling medicines in his two occupied flats in the MP Nagar area. This comes after Pandey was arrested in March for abetting the suicide of his wife, who was also a doctor and had allegedly faced harassment from her husband.