The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea seeking the disqualification of Prime Minister Narendra Modi from contesting elections for allegedly making religious appeals during a speech in Uttar Pradesh. The plea claimed that PM Modi had asked voters to vote for his party in the name of Hindu and Sikh deities and places of worship, violating the Model Code of Conduct. However, the court dismissed the petition, stating that there was no evidence of a violation and the Election Commission is obligated to make an independent decision on the matter. The plea had also mentioned PM Modi's statements regarding the Ram Temple construction, Kartarpur Sahib Corridor, and GST exemption for langars in gurdwaras.
Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea for PM Modi's Disqualification over Religious Appeals
Background:
The petition against Prime Minister Narendra Modi stemmed from his speech during the 2019 Lok Sabha election campaign in Uttar Pradesh. In the speech, Modi allegedly made religious appeals, asking voters to support his party in the name of Hindu and Sikh deities and places of worship.
Court's Ruling:
On June 22, 2023, the Delhi High Court dismissed the plea seeking Modi's disqualification. The court held that there was no evidence of a violation of the Model Code of Conduct, which prohibits candidates from making religious appeals during elections. The court further stated that the Election Commission is the appropriate authority to investigate and decide on such allegations.
Petitioner's Claims:
The petition, filed by a lawyer named Surinder Singh, had argued that Modi's statements amounted to a violation of the Model Code of Conduct because they appealed to religious sentiments. The petition cited specific statements made by Modi, including:
Court's Reasoning:
The court rejected the petition's arguments, stating that the statements made by Modi were not aimed at influencing voters on religious grounds. The court noted that Modi had made similar statements about other states and religions, and that his speech was not solely targeted at religious sentiments.
The court also emphasized the role of the Election Commission in such matters, stating that it is the Commission's responsibility to interpret and enforce the Model Code of Conduct.
FAQs:
1. What is the Model Code of Conduct?
The Model Code of Conduct is a set of guidelines issued by the Election Commission to ensure fair and ethical elections. It prohibits candidates and political parties from using religious appeals, spreading false information, or engaging in other unethical practices during the election campaign.
2. Can candidates be disqualified for violating the Model Code of Conduct?
Yes, candidates can be disqualified if they are found to have violated the Model Code of Conduct. However, the decision to disqualify a candidate is made by the Election Commission after conducting an investigation and considering all the evidence.
3. What were the specific allegations against PM Modi?
PM Modi was accused of making religious appeals by asking voters to support his party in the name of Hindu and Sikh deities and places of worship. The petition cited specific statements made by Modi during his election speech in Uttar Pradesh.
4. Why did the court dismiss the petition?
The court dismissed the petition because it found no evidence of a violation of the Model Code of Conduct. The court held that Modi's statements were not aimed at influencing voters on religious grounds and that the Election Commission is the appropriate authority to investigate such allegations.
5. What is the significance of the court's ruling?
The court's ruling reaffirms the authority of the Election Commission to interpret and enforce the Model Code of Conduct. It also demonstrates the importance of avoiding religious appeals during election campaigns to ensure fair and ethical elections.
A meeting of the Joint Parliamentary Committee discussing the Waqf (Amendment) Bill turned chaotic when Trinamool Congress MP Kalyan Banerjee broke a glass bottle in response to an objection from a BJP MP. Banerjee has been suspended from the meeting for his behavior and opposition members walked out in protest. This is not the first instance of heated arguments over the contentious bill, leading to tension between ruling and opposition members.
Tamil Nadu Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, grandson of legendary politician Kalaignar, sticks to his statement comparing Sanatan Dharma to dengue and malaria. He defends it as a call to address the mistreatment of women in the Hindu religion and echoes the views of prominent Dravidian leaders. Despite facing protests and legal action, he refuses to apologize, stating he stands by his words.
In a surprising turn of events, a man accused of shouting anti-India slogans was granted bail by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on the condition that he salute the Indian flag 21 times a month, while also shouting "Bharat Mata ki Jai." This decision by the court has sparked debate and raised questions about the use of such unusual bail conditions in cases of sedition. Some are praising the court's decision, while others are concerned about potential infringement on the accused's rights. This case highlights the complexities and controversies surrounding issues of free speech and nationalism in India.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin has sparked a debate over population control laws by encouraging state residents to consider having more children. This comes after Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu recently proposed incentives for families to have more children, citing concerns over an ageing population and reduced political influence. The remark by Stalin has also raised questions about the delimitation process and its potential impact on southern states.
A court in Bareilly, India has sentenced five individuals, including the father and relatives of a 19-year-old woman, to life imprisonment for her murder after she resisted an arranged marriage. The woman was forced into the marriage against her will and tensions escalated between her and her in-laws leading to her father and his relatives pouring acid on her, resulting in her death. The case highlights ongoing issues of gender discrimination and violence against women in India, as well as disparities in education and resources between rural and urban areas.
Indigenous Australian senator Lidia Thorpe caused a stir on Monday when she harshly heckled King Charles during his visit to the Australian Parliament House in Canberra. As she was escorted out of the chamber, Thorpe continued to shout anti-colonial slogans, demanding the return of land that was taken from her people. The confrontation was captured on video and quickly went viral, causing shock and outrage among lawmakers and other dignitaries present.
Chief Ministers Chandrababu Naidu and MK Stalin are urging families in Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu to have more children, citing concerns about ageing population and potential loss of Lok Sabha seats in the upcoming delimitation process. While Naidu has even proposed legislation to incentivize larger families, Stalin has jokingly suggested aiming for 16 children for prosperity, highlighting the impact this population growth could have on the political landscape in India. Meanwhile, a recent government report predicts a significant rise in the number of elderly citizens in the country, particularly in the southern states.
At a mass marriage event in Chennai, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin referenced a Tamil adage and expressed concern over the impact of the Lok Sabha delimitation exercise on family planning. He urged couples to continue giving Tamil names to their children and reminded them that the traditional saying about acquiring 16 types of wealth does not refer to having 16 children. This comes just days after Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu controversially advocated for women to have more children to stabilize the population in his state.
Lidia Thorpe, a prominent Indigenous activist and independent senator, made headlines for her controversial protest during King Charles III's visit to Australia. Shouting for a treaty and the return of stolen Aboriginal remains, Thorpe's outburst in the Australian parliament shed light on ongoing issues of colonization. Despite facing backlash, Thorpe remains dedicated to her stance on formal recognition and commitment to addressing systemic injustices towards Indigenous peoples.
After deciding to vacate the Budgam Assembly seat, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah has officially announced that he will be representing the Ganderbal constituency. He expressed his gratitude towards the people of Budgam and promised to continue working for them over the next five years. This move marks the end of the six-year period when J&K didn't have an Assembly and the NC, with support from other parties, will continue to hold the majority in the 95-member Assembly.