The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea seeking the disqualification of Prime Minister Narendra Modi from contesting elections for allegedly making religious appeals during a speech in Uttar Pradesh. The plea claimed that PM Modi had asked voters to vote for his party in the name of Hindu and Sikh deities and places of worship, violating the Model Code of Conduct. However, the court dismissed the petition, stating that there was no evidence of a violation and the Election Commission is obligated to make an independent decision on the matter. The plea had also mentioned PM Modi's statements regarding the Ram Temple construction, Kartarpur Sahib Corridor, and GST exemption for langars in gurdwaras.
Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea for PM Modi's Disqualification over Religious Appeals
Background:
The petition against Prime Minister Narendra Modi stemmed from his speech during the 2019 Lok Sabha election campaign in Uttar Pradesh. In the speech, Modi allegedly made religious appeals, asking voters to support his party in the name of Hindu and Sikh deities and places of worship.
Court's Ruling:
On June 22, 2023, the Delhi High Court dismissed the plea seeking Modi's disqualification. The court held that there was no evidence of a violation of the Model Code of Conduct, which prohibits candidates from making religious appeals during elections. The court further stated that the Election Commission is the appropriate authority to investigate and decide on such allegations.
Petitioner's Claims:
The petition, filed by a lawyer named Surinder Singh, had argued that Modi's statements amounted to a violation of the Model Code of Conduct because they appealed to religious sentiments. The petition cited specific statements made by Modi, including:
Court's Reasoning:
The court rejected the petition's arguments, stating that the statements made by Modi were not aimed at influencing voters on religious grounds. The court noted that Modi had made similar statements about other states and religions, and that his speech was not solely targeted at religious sentiments.
The court also emphasized the role of the Election Commission in such matters, stating that it is the Commission's responsibility to interpret and enforce the Model Code of Conduct.
FAQs:
1. What is the Model Code of Conduct?
The Model Code of Conduct is a set of guidelines issued by the Election Commission to ensure fair and ethical elections. It prohibits candidates and political parties from using religious appeals, spreading false information, or engaging in other unethical practices during the election campaign.
2. Can candidates be disqualified for violating the Model Code of Conduct?
Yes, candidates can be disqualified if they are found to have violated the Model Code of Conduct. However, the decision to disqualify a candidate is made by the Election Commission after conducting an investigation and considering all the evidence.
3. What were the specific allegations against PM Modi?
PM Modi was accused of making religious appeals by asking voters to support his party in the name of Hindu and Sikh deities and places of worship. The petition cited specific statements made by Modi during his election speech in Uttar Pradesh.
4. Why did the court dismiss the petition?
The court dismissed the petition because it found no evidence of a violation of the Model Code of Conduct. The court held that Modi's statements were not aimed at influencing voters on religious grounds and that the Election Commission is the appropriate authority to investigate such allegations.
5. What is the significance of the court's ruling?
The court's ruling reaffirms the authority of the Election Commission to interpret and enforce the Model Code of Conduct. It also demonstrates the importance of avoiding religious appeals during election campaigns to ensure fair and ethical elections.
As Trump spoke to the Israeli parliament, members of the joint Hadash-Ta’al party disrupted the proceedings, holding up a sign that read "Genocide." They were swiftly removed by security personnel, while other members chanted in support of Trump. Amidst the chaos, Trump remarked on the efficiency of the protesters' removal. One of the expelled members later posted on social media, criticizing Netanyahu's government for committing "crimes against humanity" and advocating for the end of the occupation and recognition of Palestinian statehood.
During his address at the Knesset, US President Donald Trump was interrupted by two members of the Knesset, Ofer Cassif and Ayman Odeh, who were later escorted out by security. This comes after the release of 20 living hostages who had been in captivity for over two years, a conflict that Trump played a crucial role in ending. However, the President's speech was met with protests due to his statements about Gaza and the demand to release the Epstein files.
After two years of war and devastation in Gaza, Hamas has released all 20 of the last living hostages as part of a breakthrough ceasefire deal with Israel. The prisoners will be transported to the West Bank and Gaza Strip while US President Donald Trump is in the region to discuss postwar plans with other leaders. While questions still remain about the future, this marks a significant step towards ending the ongoing conflict and providing much-needed relief to the famine-stricken Gaza.
A joint inquiry committee has submitted recommendations for disciplinary action against the Vice Chancellor of Nishtar Medical University, Dr Mehnaz Khakwani, and other officials involved in an investigation into the infection of 31 dialysis patients with HIV at Nishtar Hospital. These recommendations were made under the PEDA Act following directives from Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz Sharif. The committee found that Dr Khakwani failed to implement and monitor SOPs, leading to the outbreak, and has recommended her removal and one-year suspension from public service.
Former Bihar Chief Minister Lalu Prasad Yadav and his family are facing charges of corruption, criminal conspiracy, and cheating in the IRCTC 'scam' case. Despite pleading 'not guilty' in the Delhi court, they have been accused of favouring a private company in awarding contracts for two IRCTC hotels in exchange for prime land in Patna. The CBI filed a charge sheet against Prasad, his wife Rabri, and their son Tejashwi in 2018.
The Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC) leaders have faced further extensions of remand and a lack of access to legal representatives since March, when they were arrested for peacefully protesting enforced disappearances. In a recent hearing, the Pakistani authorities chose to hold the proceedings inside a prison rather than an open courtroom, effectively barring families, journalists, and neutral observers from attending. This move has been condemned as a deliberate attempt to suppress transparency and further institutionalize the criminalization of peaceful political dissent in the region.
A Delhi court formally charged Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) President Lalu Prasad Yadav, his wife Rabri Devi, and their son Tejashwi Yadav with corruption, conspiracy, and cheating in the alleged IRCTC scam case. The trial will proceed after all the accused pleaded not guilty. The case involves allegations of corruption in the allocation of maintenance contracts for IRCTC hotels during Lalu Prasad Yadav's tenure as Railway Minister. The court heard arguments from both the prosecution and defence before reserving its order.
On the International Day of Older Persons, Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai announced a range of initiatives for the welfare of senior citizens. These include setting up of modern old-age homes, a service center for repairing assistive devices, and deploying 25 de-addiction awareness vans. The CM also stressed the importance of respecting and caring for the elderly, and highlighted the various welfare schemes currently benefiting over 14 lakh senior citizens in the state. The event also featured cultural performances and a health camp for the elderly.
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's statement on the Durgapur gangrape case has sparked intense controversy, with the opposition accusing her of victim shaming. Banerjee, while speaking about the incident, questioned why the victim was out at 12:30 am, leading to backlash and allegations of insensitivity towards the victim. The chief minister has clarified her statement, denying any intention of victim shaming and reiterating her commitment to bringing the perpetrators to justice. Meanwhile, the BJP has used the incident to criticize the safety of women under the current regime and questioned the timing of Banerjee's remark.
In a significant shift in policy, Pakistan has denounced the Afghan Taliban as illegitimate and accused them of carrying out attacks on the Pak-Afghan border. This marks a drastic change from their previous endorsement of the Taliban government and signals a rupture in their once-close relationship. Experts believe that this shift is a forced decision in response to Taliban defiance and increased violence from TTP, revealing Pakistan's loss of influence over the Taliban leadership. This move also signifies the downfall of Pakistan's long-standing strategic depth doctrine, which relied on a friendly Afghan regime as a counterweight against India.