The proceedings in both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha were adjourned after Congress members protested remarks made by Home Minister Amit Shah that they claim insulted B.R. Ambedkar. Congress leaders and other opposition members raised slogans and held posters in solidarity, demanding an apology from Shah. However, the government has defended the statements, with some ministers accusing the Congress of disrespecting Ambedkar's legacy. The disruptions led to the adjournment of both Houses for the day.
Congress Protests Home Minister's Remarks on Ambedkar, Causing Parliament Adjournment
Background
On March 13, 2023, during a discussion in the Lok Sabha on reservations, Home Minister Amit Shah made remarks that drew heavy criticism from the Congress party. Shah stated that Babasaheb B.R. Ambedkar opposed the reservation system and that it was Jawaharlal Nehru who introduced it.
Ambedkar was the chairman of the Constituent Assembly and is widely regarded as the architect of the Indian Constitution. He was a strong advocate for the upliftment of Dalits and other marginalized communities. His legacy has been a subject of political debate, with different parties claiming to uphold his principles.
Protests and Reactions
Congress members in the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha immediately protested Shah's remarks, raising slogans and holding posters. They demanded an apology from the Home Minister and accused him of insulting Ambedkar.
The disruptions forced the adjournment of both Houses for the day. The Congress party also held a press conference later, where they reiterated their condemnation of Shah's statements and demanded an apology.
Government's Defense
The government defended Shah's remarks, with several ministers accusing the Congress of disrespecting Ambedkar's legacy. Law and Justice Minister Kiren Rijiju said that the Congress had "perverted" Ambedkar's writings and had no right to lecture others on his ideology.
Impact and Significance
The controversy has highlighted the ongoing political debate over Ambedkar's legacy and the issue of reservations. It has also raised questions about the sanctity of Parliament and the level of decorum expected in such debates.
Top 5 FAQs and Answers
1. What did Amit Shah say about Ambedkar? He said that Ambedkar opposed the reservation system and that it was Nehru who introduced it.
2. Why did the Congress party protest? They accused Shah of insulting Ambedkar, who is a revered figure for many Dalits and other marginalized communities.
3. What has been the government's response? The government has defended Shah's remarks and accused the Congress of disrespecting Ambedkar's legacy.
4. What is the significance of this controversy? It highlights the ongoing political debate over Ambedkar's legacy and the issue of reservations. It also raises questions about the sanctity of Parliament and the level of decorum expected in such debates.
5. What are the potential implications of this controversy? It could further polarize the country along political and caste lines. It could also damage the credibility of Parliament and make it more difficult for constructive debates to take place in the future.
The Karnataka High Court has denied interim relief to social media giant X Corp in its petition challenging the government's new content-blocking mechanism. X Corp argued that the mechanism, set up through the Sahyog portal, does not comply with the safeguards mandated by Section 69A of the Information Technology Act. The Court has posted the matter for final hearing in April and has urged both parties to comply with Indian law.
Amidst a series of incidents involving MNS activists resorting to violence against non-Marathi speakers, party chief Raj Thackeray has declared a revival of the party's "Mi Marathi" campaign. The ruling Mahayuti and opposition MVA parties have remained cautious in their reactions, with Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis stating that demanding Marathi in Maharashtra is not wrong but violence will not be tolerated. While the BJP is reportedly backing the MNS for the upcoming BMC polls, former NCP minister believes it is a ploy to weaken the Shiv Sena-led alliance. The MNS, which has been struggling in the state elections, has found an opportunity to regain political relevance under Thackeray's leadership.
The Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 was passed by Parliament after a 13-hour long debate in the Rajya Sabha. The government hailed it as a "historic reform" for the benefit of the minority community, while the opposition criticized it as "anti-Muslim" and "unconstitutional". The revised bill, which aims to enhance the management and registration process of waqf properties, was approved by both Houses of Parliament and awaits presidential assent to become law. The Union Minority Affairs Minister noted that the Joint Parliamentary Committee's consultation process for this bill was the largest in India's democratic history, receiving over 97 lakh petitions and opinions from various stakeholders.
In a surprising turn of events, the ruling Biju Janata Dal (BJD) allowed its seven Rajya Sabha MPs to vote their conscience instead of following the party whip, resulting in the passage of the controversial Waqf (Amendment) Bill in the Upper House. The final tally of 128 in favour and 95 against exposes divisions within the Opposition, with some parties raising concerns about the bill's potential impact on minority communities. BJD's decision to allow a free vote was driven by the party's sensitivity towards various sections of the minority community.
After Rajya Sabha passed the Waqf Amendment Bill with 128 votes in favour and 95 opposing it, JDU Minority Secretary Shah Nawaz Malik resigned from the party and other posts in protest against the party's stand on the bill. He stated that the party's support for the bill was a betrayal of Indian Muslims and went against their belief in the party's secular ideology. The bill, which aims to enhance the administration and management of waqf properties, is facing widespread opposition from the minority community, with the Grand Mufti of Jammu and Kashmir, Mufti Nasir-ul-Islam, calling it anti-Muslim and stating that the community is planning to challenge it in the Supreme Court.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin has declared that his political party, the DMK, will challenge the recently passed Waqf Bill in the Supreme Court. The CM condemned the passing of the amendment at 2 am, alleging pressure from a few allies, despite opposition from most parties in India. He also highlighted that the state Assembly has already passed a resolution opposing the amendment, and that a case will be filed in the Supreme Court on behalf of the DMK. The Waqf Bill seeks to improve the administration and management of waqf properties in India, but its passing has been met with criticism and opposition.
The Lok Sabha was in session until the early hours of the morning, debating and passing important bills. However, amidst the proceedings, the government initiated a short discussion on the proclamation of President's Rule in Manipur at 2 AM which lasted only 41 minutes. The Opposition was surprised and protested, but the Speaker allowed the discussion to continue. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, in his speech, highlighted the failures of the government in maintaining law and order in Manipur and questioned the timing and necessity of the President's Rule.
The Waqf Amendment Bill, which was earlier passed by the Lok Sabha, sparked a heated debate in the Rajya Sabha today. While BJP MP JP Nadda defended PM Modi's welfare for all principle, Shiv Sena MP Sanjay attacked the BJP for ignoring the interests of Muslims. Union Minister Giriraj Singh also joined in, accusing the Congress of crossing the limits of appeasement by giving away 123 properties to Waqf in Lutyens' Delhi overnight in 2013. The debate highlights the deep division and polarizing views over the proposed amendments to the Waqf Act in Uttar Pradesh, the state with the highest number of Waqf properties in the country.
In a digitized effort, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis transferred a grant of ₹25 crore to 560 gaushalas across the state under the Desi Cow Conservation Scheme. This first phase of the scheme will benefit over 56,000 indigenous cows for their upkeep. Fadnavis emphasized the importance of preserving indigenous cows for rural development and praised the initiative taken by the Maharashtra Goseva Commission. With lower milk productivity, these cow shelters play a vital role in providing necessary care for non-milking and unproductive cows, making the scheme a major relief for them.
Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav criticized the BJP for taking 10 months to select a national president, while Amit Shah countered by pointing out dynastic practices among opposition parties. Reports suggest that the BJP will announce its new national president by the third week of April to replace JP Nadda. Nadda's tenure was extended until June 2024, but the new president will still be chosen after a process involving the party's 12-13 crore members.