In a major decision, the Bombay High Court has declared the remand orders passed by the Juvenile Justice Board in the case of a 17-year-old accused in a drunken driving case as 'illegal'. The court has directed the release of the minor boy, who was kept in a juvenile correctional home in Pune for over a month, into the custody of his paternal aunt. The court also questioned the jurisdiction of the JJB and pointed out that the boy's bail should have not been nullified by the remand orders.
In a significant development, the Bombay High Court has ruled that the remand orders issued by the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB) in the case of a 17-year-old accused in a drunken driving accident are "illegal." The court has ordered the release of the minor, who had been held in a juvenile correctional center in Pune for over a month, into the custody of his paternal aunt.
The court's decision raises questions about the jurisdiction of the JJB and underscores the need for proper procedures in cases involving minors.
<h3>Background of the Case</h3>On July 15, 2023, the minor boy allegedly drove a Porsche car in an intoxicated condition and crashed into a roadside vendor in Pune, killing the vendor and injuring two others. The police arrested the boy and charged him with culpable homicide not amounting to murder, rash driving, and other offenses.
The JJB initially granted the boy bail, but subsequently revoked it and remanded him to a juvenile correctional home. The boy's family then approached the Bombay High Court challenging the JJB's remand orders.
<h3>Court's Decision</h3>The Bombay High Court, after hearing arguments from both sides, ruled that the remand orders passed by the JJB were "illegal." The court held that the JJB had no jurisdiction to revoke the boy's bail and that the remand orders were not in accordance with the law.
The court also questioned the JJB's finding that the boy was a threat to society and that there was a risk of him committing further offenses. The court noted that the boy had no previous criminal record and that he had cooperated with the investigation.
<h3>Release of the Minor</h3>Following the court's order, the minor boy was released from the juvenile correctional home and handed over to the custody of his paternal aunt. The court imposed certain conditions on the boy's release, including that he not leave the country without the court's permission and that he attend counseling sessions as directed by the court.
<h3>Top 5 FAQs</h3><strong>1. Why was the JJB's remand order declared illegal?</strong>
The Bombay High Court ruled that the JJB had no jurisdiction to revoke the boy's bail and that the remand orders were not in accordance with the law.
<strong>2. What was the basis of the JJB's finding that the boy was a threat to society?</strong>
The JJB did not provide any specific reasons for its finding that the boy was a threat to society. The Bombay High Court noted that the boy had no previous criminal record and that he had cooperated with the investigation.
<strong>3. What conditions did the High Court impose on the minor's release?</strong>
The court ordered that the boy not leave the country without the court's permission and that he attend counseling sessions as directed by the court.
<strong>4. What are the potential consequences of the Bombay High Court's decision?</strong>
The decision could have implications for other cases involving minors accused of criminal offenses. It could also lead to a review of the procedures followed by the Juvenile Justice Boards.
<strong>5. What are the next steps in the case?</strong>
The case is likely to continue in the Juvenile Justice Board, where the boy will face trial for the offenses he has been charged with.
The Indian National Congress (INC) has announced its plans to launch a month-and-a-half-long campaign in Jammu and Kashmir on April 22. The purpose of the campaign is to demand the restoration of statehood and to further the “Save the Constitution” movement. With the recent appointment of Syed Naseer Hussain as the new J&K in-charge, the party hopes to regain its lost support in the Union Territory. This campaign comes at a crucial time, as former supporters of the Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad have recently dissolved their party, raising questions about their political future. The Congress hopes to use this opportunity to highlight the BJP's failures in empowering elected governments and its betrayal over statehood.
Thousands of citizens in Pune are rallying together through an online petition to demand the protection of their city's hills and hill slopes from any construction. The petition is addressed to the former Pune Municipal Commissioner and Chairman of the state-appointed Committee on Bio-Diversity Park and Hill Top Hill Slopes. The citizens are concerned that the committee's review may result in allowing construction on the hills, while strict measures have already been mandated by the government to prevent it. The citizens stress the importance of preserving these natural areas for the city's ecological balance and urge the government to uphold its promise to future generations.
After the devastating terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, India has suspended the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan. This decision was made during a key meeting chaired by Union Home Minister Amit Shah, with discussions on potential actions being taken against Pakistan. As tensions between the two countries continue to escalate, Indian leaders have condemned Pakistan for their involvement in the attack and have vowed to take strong measures in response.
The Indian Army made its first major move since the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, as they killed top Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) commander Altaf Lalli in an encounter in Jammu and Kashmir's Bandipora district. The security forces are on the hunt for the terrorists responsible for the brutal killing of 26 civilians and have launched a massive anti-terror operation. In other developments, Indian Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi visited Srinagar for a security review meeting and the authorities demolished the houses of two suspected terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack.
In a hearing at the Supreme Court, the bench rebuked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for his "irresponsible" comments about freedom fighter Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. The judges highlighted the need to show respect for India's freedom fighters and questioned whether Gandhi was aware of his grandmother and Mahatma Gandhi praising Savarkar. The court also stayed an Allahabad High Court order that refused to dismiss a lower court's summons against Gandhi over his alleged remarks about Savarkar.
The Supreme Court has stepped in to warn Congress MP Rahul Gandhi over his comments about India's independence activist Veer Savarkar, staying a trial court's summons to the politician. The top court emphasized that Savarkar is a highly respected figure in Maharashtra and stated that no one would be allowed to make derogatory remarks about freedom fighters. The court also pointed out that Gandhi's family has had a history of praising Savarkar and Gandhi himself has been warned that the court will take suo motu cognizance of any such remarks. Additionally, the article also mentions an attack in Jammu and Kashmir that has led to heightened tensions between India and Pakistan.
In a successful operation by the security forces, a Lashkar-e-Taliba (LeT) terrorist associate, identified as Altaf Lalli, was killed in an ongoing encounter in the Bandipora district of Jammu and Kashmir. The encounter began after the security forces received intelligence about the presence of terrorists in the area. Two security personnel have also been injured in the exchange of fire and are currently undergoing treatment at a nearby hospital. The clash highlights the continued efforts of the security forces to combat terrorism in the region.
The Telangana-Chhattisgarh border is a hotbed of tension as security forces step up their efforts to root out Maoist activity from the region. Top Maoist leader Hidma is the target of current high-security operations, with forces strategically advancing through previously inaccessible areas. With mounting pressure, sources indicate that the hold of the Maoists in the region is gradually weakening, making for a tense and critical situation.
As the nation grapples with the aftermath of a terror attack in Pahalgam, security forces are undertaking a massive operation in the dense Karregutta hills forest to eliminate the heart of Naxal command. This operation, involving 7,000 personnel and cutting-edge technology, aims to strike a blow at Naxalism by targeting top leaders of the PLGA Battalion No. 1. This bold move by the CRPF, with the Director General personally overseeing the operation, marks a turning point in the fight against Maoist insurgency. With five Naxals already killed and more likely to come, the operation is being hailed as a decisive victory and could potentially spell the end of Naxalism in India.
The US Government has publicly criticized The New York Times for its reporting on the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, calling attention to the difference between the newspaper's use of "militant" instead of "terrorist." This choice of words is not only misleading but also minimizes the severity of the attack, which was claimed by a Pakistan-based group with links to Lashkar-e-Taiba. The US House Foreign Affairs Committee took to social media to point out the error and highlight the real nature of the attack, noting that it has significant implications for regional security.