Anuradha Tiwari, the CEO of a Bengaluru-based content writing agency, sparked a heated debate on social media with her post captioned "Brahmin genes." Defending her post, Anuradha argued that upper castes, referred to as UCs, do not benefit from the reservation system and should be able to proudly showcase their lineage. While some users supported her stance, others pointed out the insensitivity of her post and the absurdity of equating Brahmin genes with superiority. This post has reignited the ongoing discussion on casteism and reservation policies in India.
Brahmin Privilege and Casteism in India: A Social Media Debate
Background
Caste, a traditional social hierarchy rooted in ancient Hindu scriptures, continues to play a significant role in Indian society. The caste system divides people into thousands of endogamous groups, each associated with a specific occupation and social status. Brahmins, the priestly caste, have traditionally enjoyed high status and privilege.
In recent years, affirmative action policies known as reservations have been implemented by the Indian government to uplift historically disadvantaged castes. These policies reserve seats for members of Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in education, employment, and government representation.
Anuradha Tiwari's Post
Anuradha Tiwari, the CEO of a Bengaluru-based content writing agency, ignited controversy on social media with a post titled "Brahmin genes." In her post, Tiwari argued that Brahmins should be proud of their lineage and do not benefit from the reservation system.
Reactions and Debate
Tiwari's post sparked a heated debate on social media, with some users supporting her view and others criticizing it for being insensitive and perpetuating casteist stereotypes. The post reignited the ongoing discussion about casteism and reservation policies in India.
FAQs
1. What is the caste system in India?
The caste system is a social hierarchy that categorizes people based on their birth into thousands of endogamous groups. Brahmins, the priestly caste, have traditionally been at the top of the hierarchy.
2. What is the purpose of reservation policies in India?
Affirmative action policies, known as reservations, aim to uplift historically disadvantaged castes by reserving seats for them in education, employment, and government representation.
3. Does Anuradha Tiwari's post reflect the views of all Brahmins?
No. There is a diversity of views within the Brahmin community on the issue of casteism and reservation policies. Some Brahmins support Tiwari's views, while others reject them as outdated and divisive.
4. Is casteism still a problem in India?
Yes. Despite legal and constitutional protections, caste-based discrimination persists in various forms, including discrimination in education, employment, marriage, and social interactions.
5. What can be done to address casteism in India?
Addressing casteism requires a multi-pronged approach that includes education, awareness-raising, legal enforcement, and transformative social policies that promote equality and inclusivity.
Congress Leader Rahul Gandhi is set to address a press conference on Thursday, where he is expected to present evidence of alleged vote theft in Indian elections. Gandhi has been vocal about the issue in previous speeches, accusing the government of using unfair means to form their power. He also claimed that the Election Commission is working in collaboration with the ruling party. The Congress promised to provide proof to back their claims and expose corruption in the Mahadevapura Assembly segment in Karnataka.
The centre has directed the removal of 138 YouTube videos and 83 Instagram posts related to Adani, citing a Delhi court order. The move comes amid ongoing disputes over the Adani Group's involvement in various projects. This action has been met with criticism, with some questioning the government's interference in online content.
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi revealed that the party has uncovered over 6,000 voter deletions in Aland constituency, Karnataka, ahead of the 2023 Assembly elections. According to their investigation, these deletions were not random or accidental but specifically targeted booths where the party was performing strongly. The deletions were carried out through fake applications and mobile numbers from outside Karnataka, raising concerns of an organized effort to manipulate the election process. Congress is calling for a thorough investigation to uphold the integrity of the democratic process.
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has strongly criticized Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, accusing him of protecting those involved in "vote chori" (vote stealing) and undermining democracy. He cited recent instances of voter deletions in Karnataka's Aland and fraudulent additions in Maharashtra's Rajura as evidence of systematic targeting of Congress voters. Speaking at a press conference, Gandhi urged for a fair and transparent election process to uphold the principles of democracy.
Congress MP and leader of opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, held a news conference and claimed that the Chief Election Commissioner is protecting those who are destroying the Constitution and democracy in India. He also alleged that a group of people is systematically cutting the votes of minority groups who vote for the Congress party. In response, politicians from different parties have dismissed his accusations and stated that he is making these statements out of desperation and frustration.
United States President Donald Trump has expressed delight at the suspension of ABC's late-night talk show hosted by Jimmy Kimmel, following backlash against his comments on the killing of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. Trump criticized Kimmel's talent and ratings, calling him a "total loser" and "Fake News" host. The show will reportedly be replaced by other ABC programs and has been taken off air indefinitely. This comes after Kimmel addressed the killing of Kirk during a monologue and condemned attempts to politicize the case.
On Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 75th birthday, various ministers, politicians, and private companies took out expensive advertisements in English newspapers to wish him. The Times of India had the most ads, followed by The Indian Express, Hindustan Times, and The Hindu. Some advertisements were placed by lesser-known politicians and political parties, while companies and trade associations also joined in to greet the PM. One advertisement even detailed the achievements of PM Modi in seven milestones.
In a powerful speech, Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai highlighted the essential role of human dignity in the Constitution and the judiciary's responsibility to uphold it. He emphasized that dignity forms the very core of fundamental rights and has been consistently upheld by the Supreme Court in landmark judgments. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla echoed this sentiment, stating that it is crucial for the government and judiciary to work together to deliver justice to the people.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin will be attending the grand celebration of Mupperum Vizha, which marks the birth anniversary of party founder CN Annadurai, social reformer Periyar, and DMK's founding day. Several prestigious awards, including the Periyar Award for Kanimozhi Karunanidhi, will be presented during the event, which has been designed like a fortress with a capacity to seat one lakh people. The stage is dominated by portraits of Chief Minister Stalin and Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, along with banners highlighting the achievements of the Tamil Nadu government.
The Vantara zoological rescue and rehabilitation centre, established by Reliance Foundation in Jamnagar, was under scrutiny by the Supreme Court following allegations of irregularities. On 15 September 2025, the Court accepted the findings of the special investigation team (SIT) in a "sealed cover," concluding that there were no violations of various laws and regulations. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh expressed admiration for the justice system's rare display of efficiency in this case, but also raised questions about the use of sealed covers in court proceedings.