In a fiery speech at the Rajya Sabha, BJP MP Sudhanshu Trivedi compared PM Modi and Pandit Nehru, showcasing three key differences to highlight Modi's superiority. He mocked the Congress' claims that the two leaders cannot be compared, stating that Modi's leadership qualities far outweigh Nehru's. Trivedi also pointed out how Modi humbly waited to be selected as BJP's prime ministerial candidate, while Nehru was chosen unanimously without receiving a single vote from his party. This further exemplifies the stark contrast between the two leaders, strengthening Trivedi's argument of Modi's unmatched leadership.
In a recent speech in the Rajya Sabha, BJP MP Sudhanshu Trivedi engaged in a heated comparison between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and India's first Prime Minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru. Trivedi showcased three key differences to highlight Modi's superiority as a leader.
The comparison between Modi and Nehru has been a long-standing theme in Indian political discourse. Supporters of the BJP often portray Modi as a strong and decisive leader, while critics of the Congress view Nehru as a visionary who laid the foundation for a modern and democratic India.
Q1: Why did Trivedi make the comparison between Modi and Nehru? A1: Trivedi intended to highlight Modi's superiority as a leader and to refute claims by the Congress that the two could not be compared.
Q2: What were some of the specific examples used by Trivedi to support his argument? A2: Trivedi cited Modi's success in handling the COVID-19 pandemic, economic reforms, and foreign policy initiatives.
Q3: How did the Congress respond to Trivedi's speech? A3: Congress leaders have criticized Trivedi's comparison, arguing that it was politically motivated and based on a selective reading of history.
Q4: Is it appropriate to compare Modi and Nehru? A4: Comparisons between leaders from different eras can be complex and subjective. However, such discussions can provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of different political approaches.
Q5: What is the significance of the comparison between Modi and Nehru? A5: The comparison reflects ongoing debates in Indian politics about the legacies of different leaders and the paths that India should take moving forward.
The Supreme Court has put a temporary hold on the Kerala High Court's ruling that 404.76-acre Munambam land is not Waqf property. This came after a Special Leave Petition was filed by the Kerala Waqf Samrakshana Vedhi, which contested the High Court's verdict. The Court clarified that despite the stay, the State Government was right in appointing a one-member Judicial Commission to probe the history and nature of the land. Local residents, however, have opposed the petition and argued for their right to the land.
The Andhra Pradesh State Cabinet, chaired by Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu, approved a wide range of proposals in the fields of urban development, industries, energy, tourism, infrastructure, and welfare. These decisions are expected to attract an investment of over Rs 25,000 crore and create more than 1.1 lakh jobs. The Cabinet also approved a 3.64% hike in DA/DR for government employees and pensioners, and other initiatives such as the reconstruction of check-dams and the upgradation of teachers in tribal welfare schools.
The Supreme Court has granted a stay on the Kerala High Court's finding that the Munambam land in Ernakulam district is not waqf property. The Court also ordered that the current status quo of the land be maintained until the next date of hearing. Although the High Court's declaration will remain stayed, the inquiry commission headed by former judge Justice CN Ramachandran Nair can continue to function. The case involves a dispute over 135 acres of land that was originally gifted to Farook College, now facing protests and challenges from the local residents.
The passing of former Union Home Minister and Congress heavyweight Shivraj Patil has left a void in the political landscape of Maharashtra. His tenure in the Ministry of Home Affairs was marked by several contentious moments, including controversies over his response to terror attacks and criticism over his attire during a national security crisis. His resignation after the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai had a lasting impact on his reputation, as leaked US diplomatic cables described him as "spectacularly inept". Despite this, Patil is being fondly remembered by Congress leaders for his dedication to public service and contributions to the nation's democratic institutions.
Delhi Police Commissioner Rakesh Asthana was honoured during the 'Khaki Ke Sang Shiksha Aur Umang - YUVA Mashaal' programme at Begumpur, Delhi. The event, hosted by the Rohini District, aimed to recognize the efforts of Grameen Police Sahyog Samiti members and social workers in bringing positive changes to the society. Asthana was presented with a turban by elderly persons and also honoured renowned Olympic Champion wrestler Ravi Dahiya. The programme also aimed to spread awareness about the community outreach initiatives of Delhi Police among residents.
The Lok Sabha erupted into chaos as discussions on electoral reforms turned into a heated confrontation between opposition leader Rahul Gandhi and Home Minister Amit Shah. Gandhi challenged Shah to a debate on 'vote theft' allegations, while Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi expressed dissatisfaction with Shah's response to the opposition's concerns. As the opposition staged a walkout, BJP MP Tejasvi Surya criticized the move and praised Shah's speech for effectively countering their propaganda. Prime Minister Narendra Modi also commended Shah for exposing the lies of the opposition.
Former JNU student and activist Umar Khalid, who is an accused in the Delhi riots conspiracy case, has been granted interim bail for 14 days to attend his sister's wedding on December 27. This comes after multiple failed attempts to secure bail, with the court allowing temporary relief for family reasons. Khalid has been instructed to stay away from social media and can only meet family members, relatives, and close friends during the bail period.
The Maharashtra Assembly was in chaos as opposition parties raised concerns over the recent police encounter of government consultant Rohit Arya. The lawmakers claimed that the encounter was wrongful and questioned why Arya was not just shot in the leg instead. It was revealed that Arya had worked on several government projects but had not been paid for his services, leading to the extreme step. The state government has assured an ongoing inquiry into the matter.
During a lively Question Hour in the Lok Sabha, BJP MP Anurag Thakur accused a TMC MP of smoking an e-cigarette inside the House. Speaker Om Birla promised action if a written complaint is filed, while pointing out that the use of e-cigarettes is not allowed in the Lok Sabha. The incident highlights the ongoing debate on the ban on e-cigarettes in India.
A heated commotion erupted in Parliament during Question Hour on Thursday when BJP MP Anurag Thakur accused a Trinamool Congress member of using an e-cigarette in the House, a violation of both parliamentary conduct and national law. Speaker Om Birla responded by sternly stating that no such permission existed and urged Thakur to file a complaint if he had evidence to support his allegation. Amidst the back-and-forth, Thakur questioned if e-cigarettes had been allowed in the Sadan, given their nationwide ban.